其他材料的公平使用情况？ [英] Fairness usage of other material ?

问题描述

此代码项目文章：



位图初学者指南 [ ^ ]



似乎复制了以下信息：



http://paulbourke.net/dataformats/bitmaps/ [ ^ ]



我还没有看到它的引用。我想知道这是否公平？



Eric

This code project article:

A Beginners Guide to Bitmaps[^]

Seems to have copied information from:

http://paulbourke.net/dataformats/bitmaps/[^]

I haven't seen the reference of it. I wonder if it is fair?

Eric

推荐答案

然后你应该在文章写作或垃圾邮件和滥用论坛中报告。

Then you should report it in the Article Writing or Spam and Abuse forum.

这是一个简单的抄袭，应该在这里报告： http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1652005/Spam-and-Abuse-Watch.aspx [ ^ ]

好​​抓！

It is simple plagiarism and should be reported here: http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1652005/Spam-and-Abuse-Watch.aspx[^]
Good catch!

公平性这至少是值得怀疑的。即使它可能是合法的，使用图像而不提及它的来源在道德上是不可接受的。即使这样一个简单的图像也可以被认为是一种创造性的行为，所以在不提及原始来源的情况下使用它可以被认为是抄袭。



请你进一步检查这个关于可能存在抄袭的其他事实的可疑文章（通常，网上搜索短语和代码片段告诉故事）并在此处报告： http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1652005/Spam-Watch.aspx [ ^ ]？



并非那个手表论坛不只是垃圾邮件手表;它用于报告各种滥用行为;如果行为不当，剽窃行为应被视为最糟糕的行为之一。

-SA

The fairness of it is at least questionable. Even when it might be legal, the use of the images without mentioning the source of it is unacceptable ethically. Even such a simple image can be considered as a creative act, so using it without mention of the original source can be considered as plagiarism.

Would you please further inspect this suspicious article for other facts of possible plagiarism (usually, the Web search on phrases and code fragments tells the tale) and report it here: http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1652005/Spam-Watch.aspx[^]?

Not that that watch forum is not just spam watch; it's for reporting of all kinds of abuse; and plagiarizing should be considered as one of the worst kinds if misconduct.

—SA

这篇关于其他材料的公平使用情况？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！