对QA投票的第3次投票是投票吗？ [英] Is a vote of #3 on a QA post a down-vote ?

问题描述

...编辑/更新...



嗯，这很有趣：似乎实验表示投票＃3的影响不影响声誉，而ThatRaja引用的Chris M.的话强化了这个结论;但是，有些人强烈声称第3次投票导致他们在QA解决方案/答案上失利。



我认为这里有一个更广泛的问题是：＃3的投票的含义：如果它有 no 的含义，那么，有人可能会说，为什么可以投票＃3？



所以：投票＃3是否意味着投反对票，或者它是否意味着它是一个好的帖子，但不是获得更高投票的质量？



我很清楚，可能会有一些帖子具有良好的，甚至是优秀的技术内容，但它们与OP提出的问题或代码中的问题无关。



实际上QA中发布了太多种类型的罐头答案，这些答案会不加区分地再次发布，而且，它们是否与OP真正相关或不。也许这些应该得到一次投票......而不是中立投票？



我现在不太确定如何使用＃3投票：我发现......在技术领域......不确定性往往很有价值;它可以导致更敏锐的警惕！恶魔可以从很远的地方闻到确定性，并像蜂蜜蜂蜜一样蜂拥而至:)



...结束编辑/更新...



我被CP高级成员告知，QA 问题的＃3投票 回答/解决方案是一个投票;我认为＃3在QA中是一个中性投票，相当于足够;表明在回复中有一些努力，一些有价值的内容，也许是一个积极有用的意图。



我在质量保证常见问题解答中找不到任何关于此的信息。



我很欣赏在这方面开悟。



谢谢，比尔



ps一旦澄清了这一点，我们是否可以继续讨论一个非常重要的问题：有多少天使可以在别针头上跳舞？

... edit/update ...

Well, this is interesting: it appears that "experiments" indicate a vote of #3 does not affect reputation, and Chris M.'s words as quoted by ThatRaja here reinforce that conclusion; but, some people strongly claim that a vote of #3 has resulted in their losing points on a QA solution/answer.

I think there is a broader issue here which is: what is the meaning of a vote of #3: if it has no meaning, then, one could argue, why have a vote of #3 possible ?

So: does voting #3 mean a negative vote, or does it mean that it's a good post, but not of the quality to get a higher vote ?

It is clear to me that there can be posts which have good, even excellent, technical content, but they do not relate to the question the OP asked, or their problem in code.

In fact there are far too many kind-of "canned answers" posted in QA which are indiscriminately posted again, and again, whether they are truly relevant to the OP or not. Perhaps those should get a down-vote ... not a "neutral" vote ?

I am now less certain of what to use a vote of #3 for: I find ... in the technical arena ... that uncertainty is often quite valuable; it can lead to keener vigilance ! Demons can smell certainty from a great distance, and swarm to it like bees to honey :)

... end edit/update ...

I've been told by a senior CP member that a vote of #3 on a QA question answer/solution is a down-vote; I have assumed that a #3 is a "neutral" vote in QA, kind of equivalent to "adequate;" indicating some effort in the response, some valuable content, perhaps a positively helpful intent.

I cannot find any information in the QA FAQ about this.

I'd appreciate being "enlightened" in this regard.

thanks, Bill

p.s. Once this is clarified, could we move on to the really important question: how many angels can dance on the head of a pin ?

推荐答案

评论中的讨论分散了注意力从你的问题。如果它给声誉得分增加一个负值，你就可以将一些投票称为向下投票，如果这是积极的话，你可以向上投票。 3的投票是非常罕见的（大多数投票1或5 :-)）。 但是，据我记忆，在这方面，1-3是下选票（ProgramFOX的认为3的投票加零，所以我可能错了[END EDIT]）。如果您真的想使用当前设置进行检查，我们可以进行一些非破坏性实验。 :-)或者，请在此处询问： http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1645/Site-Bugs-Suggestions.aspx [ ^ ]。







我们用Maciej进行了一些实验。结果告诉我们，3投票不会影响会员的声誉得分。



此外，我们可以看到，如果我投了5票（我的投票添加了+40），然后重新投票到3，之前添加的声望点未被删除。实际上，3只影响单独帖子的分数，不会以任何方式影响会员的分数。



我们只在答案分数上测试，而不是问题。

- SA

The discussion in comment was distracting from your question. You could call some vote "down-vote" if it adds a negative value to reputation score, and "up-vote" if this is positive. The votes of 3 are pretty rare (most vote either 1 or 5 :-)). But, as far as I remember, 1-3 are down-votes, in this respect ( by ProgramFOX maintains that vote of 3 adds zero, so may by I'm wrong [END EDIT]). If you really wants to check it up using present-day settings, we can make a little non-destructive experiment. :-) Alternatively, ask here: http://www.codeproject.com/Forums/1645/Site-Bugs-Suggestions.aspx[^].



We performed a little experiment with Maciej. The result tells us that the vote of 3 does not affect the member's reputation score at all.

Additionally, we could see that, if, say, I voted 5 (my vote added +40), and then re-vote to 3, previously added reputation points are not removed. In effect, 3 only affects the score on a separate post, not affecting the member's score in any way.

We tested it only on the answer score, not on a question.

—SA

直接来自我的观察：取决于会员级别（金，银等） [ ^ ] 3星的负值是：-1到-16。在这意味着3星是投票。





我们用Sergey和ProgramFox做了实验。这很奇怪，但3星没什么改变。我们如何测试它，您可以通过阅读我们的评论找到答案。



比尔，谢谢。让我们说：我就是这个问题的原因。
如果我错了（但我可以保证你的3星投票给了我-16分），对不起。



[/ EDIT]

Direct from my observation: depending on member level (gold, silver, etc.)[^] the negative value of 3 stars is: -1 to -16. In this meaning 3 stars is a down-vote.


We did the experiment with Sergey and ProgramFox. It's strange, but 3 stars changes nothing. How we tested it, you can find out by reading our comments the the answers.

Bill, thank you. Let's say: i was the reason of this question.
If i was wrong (but i can promise that your vote of 3 stars gave me -16 points), i'm sorry.

[/EDIT]

Chris Maunder写道： [ ^ ]

3投票具体意味着中立，非事件。

这篇关于对QA投票的第3次投票是投票吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！