附加组件和插件有什么区别？ [英] What is the difference between add-ons and plugins?

问题描述

大家好，



我一直在用我的工作开发一个ASP.NET Web项目，该项目需要一种插件。换句话说，代表客户端运行的程序。



架构如下所示：在客户端的第一次浏览时，页面加载了插件机器并开始做一些事情。



现在，我的第一个问题是：

1.是否有可能为ASP开发这样的程序.NET应用程序？

2.如果是这样，它在不同平台上的工作能力，如：浏览器，操作系统，它的互操作性是多少？

3.什么是附加组件和插件之间的区别？



背面语言是C＃，我们使用过。



谢谢你，

Hallo everyone,

I have been developing an ASP.NET web project with my work-mets and the project requires a kind of plugin. In other words, a program which runs on behalf of the client side.

The architecture looks like this: at the client's first browse, the page loads the plugin on the machine and starts doing some stuffs.

Now, my first question is:
1. Is it possible to develop such a program for ASP.NET application?
2. If so, how much is its interoperability like working-ability on different platforms such as: browsers, Operating systems?
3. What is the difference between add-ons and plugins?

The back language is C#, we used.

Thank you,

推荐答案

这里最好的解释，它正是我想传达的。



你会得到关于术语差异的基本想法。



差之间-附加和 - 插件/ [ ^ ]

Its best explained here, Its exactly what I wanted to convey.

You will get basic Idea about the terminology difference.

difference-between-add-on-and-plug-in/[^]

当您说代表客户端时，您是否希望插件在服务器上执行以代表客户端执行某项任务。如果是这样，这完全可行 - 让你的插件成为可在服务器上运行的C＃程序集。



如果你想让它成为客户端，你的选项是Silverlight（不是非常便携） - 特别是最近解雇大部分Mono员工 - 或JavaScript。可以想象，可以在某种程度上基于用户选项在浏览器中加载JavaScript页面，但这可能是一个巨大的安全风险。

When you say "on behalf of the client side" do you mean you want the plug-in to execute on the server to perform some task on behalf of the client. If so this is entirely feasible - make your plug-in a C# assembly that can be run on the server.

If you want it to be client-side, your options are Silverlight (not very portable) - especially with the recent sacking of most of the Mono staff - or JavaScript. Conceivably, a JavaScript page could be loaded in the browser based on user options somehow, but that could be an enormous security risk.

这篇关于附加组件和插件有什么区别？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！