重新确定任务基线的最佳做法 [英] best practice to re-baseline a task

问题描述

当重新确定具有实际工作时间（实际成本）的任务时，BCWS将等于ACWP，这会破坏挣值报告， CPI和SPI。在重新定位
任务时，保持正确的赢得值报告的最佳做法是什么？假设我们想要重新确定任务的基线，因为它的持续时间会增加。我们是否可以仅重新添加新增的工作部分而不是整个任务？

George

解决方案

嗨乔治，

保持正确的赢得值报告的最佳做法是"不重新基线"任务。基线的
的主要用途是评估漂移......

但你可以在某些情况下创建第二个基线（最多11个基线）

Hi,

When re-baselining tasks that have actual work hours (actual cost), the BCWS will become equal to the ACWP which ruins the earned value report, the CPI, and the SPIs. What is the best practice to maintain a correct earned value report while re-baselining a task? Assume that we want to re-baseline a task because its duration increased. Can we re-baseline only the newly added portion of work instead of the whole task?

George

解决方案

Hi George,

The best practice to maintain a correct earned value report is "don't re-baseline" the task. The main use of the baseline is to evaluate the drifts...

But you can create a second baseline in some circumstances (up to 11 baselines)

这篇关于重新确定任务基线的最佳做法的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！