将ActiveSync添加到现有的EXCHANGE 2010环境中 [英] Adding ActiveSync to existing EXCHANGE 2010 environment

查看:91
本文介绍了将ActiveSync添加到现有的EXCHANGE 2010环境中的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

大家好,



我做了一些搜索,但似乎找不到任何与我的问题有关的内容。


我们目前有一个网络,其中1个Exchange Server(2010)与Blackberry Enterprise Server(Express)配合使用,考虑到我们希望从BES转移并开始使用ActiveSync的当前Blackberry趋势对于我们的设备。


我希望取消BES并引入另一个交换服务器来处理ActiveSync连接,我的问题是,最安全的方法是什么无需彻底改变网络。是否建议设置
a CAS并将其放入DMZ?


任何帮助将不胜感激。


提前致谢。

解决方案

你绝对不应该把CAS放在DMZ中。实际上,ActiveSync非常容易部署,因为它只使用一个端口进行客户端通信(443)。您只需找到一种方法将其安全地发布到Internet。 TMG是一个完美的解决方案,但微软
停止了它。您可以考虑使用UAG 2010,或者您可以使用某些第三方解决方案进行发布。


可在此处找到许多有用的信息:  http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff459593.aspx 功能


Hi all,

I have done a few searches but can't seem to find anything specific to my question.

We currently have a network with 1 Exchange Server (2010) working with a Blackberry Enterprise Server (Express), considering the current Blackberry trend we are looking to move away from BES and start using ActiveSync for our devices.

I am looking to do away with the BES and introduce another exchange server to handle just the ActiveSync connections, my question is, what is the most secure way to go about this without having to alter the network drastically. Is it recommended to set up a CAS and put it in a DMZ?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

解决方案

You definitely should not put CAS in DMZ. Actually, ActiveSync is pretty easy for deployment, as it uses just one port for client communication (443). You just have to find a way to securely publish it to the Internet. TMG was a perfect solution but Microsoft discontinued it. YOu can consider UAG 2010 instead, or you can use some third-party solution for publishing.

Lot of useful information can be found here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff459593.aspx 


这篇关于将ActiveSync添加到现有的EXCHANGE 2010环境中的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆