ECMA-376存在一些差异 [英] ECMA-376 has some discrepancy

问题描述

在ECMA-376（第4版）的第1部分"基础和标记语言参考"中。第97页上有一个表格，显示了工作簿部分可以具有的内容类型。它们是：

In ECMA-376 (4-th Edition), in Part 1 "Fundamentals And Markup Language Reference" there's a table on page 97 which shows which content types the Workbook Part can have. They are:

1）application / vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet.main + xml

2）application / vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml .template.main + xml

1) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet.main+xml
2) application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.template.main+xml

但是，据我所知，它不是完整列表。还必须：

However, it is NOT the full list, as of I know. There must be also:

1）application / vnd.ms-excel.sheet.macroEnabled.main + xml（用于启用宏）

1) application/vnd.ms-excel.sheet.macroEnabled.main+xml (for macro-enabled)

2）  application / vnd.ms-excel.addin.macroEnabled.main + xml（对于启用宏的加载项）

2) application/vnd.ms-excel.addin.macroEnabled.main+xml (for macro-enabled add-ins)

而且，我找不到，为什么所有这些部分都有"http：//purl.oclc.org/ooxml/spreadsheetml/main" as  Root Namespace实际上，例如对于Workbook Part，有"http：//schemas.openxmlformats.org/spreadsheetml/2006/main"
名称空间？

Moreover, I could not find, why all these Parts have "http://purl.oclc.org/ooxml/spreadsheetml/main" as  Root Namespace while in reality, for instance for Workbook Part, there is "http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/spreadsheetml/2006/main" namespace?

我想这个差异有一些解释。

I guess there IS some explanation to this discrepancy.

没有任何知识不是权力。

There is no knowledge that is not power.

推荐答案

Hello JohnyL，

Hello JohnyL,

感谢您的提问。协议文档团队的成员将很快回复您。

Thank you for your question. A member of the protocol documentation team will respond to you soon.

致以最诚挚的问候，

Matt Weber | Microsoft开放规范团队

Best regards,
Matt Weber | Microsoft Open Specifications Team

这篇关于ECMA-376存在一些差异的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！