建议Visual Studio项目的类型 [英] Suggest type of Visual Studio project

问题描述

Visual Studio 2008，Win 7，C ++



我想创建一个应用程序来验证TMATS文件。它是基于文本的文件，限制了基本的ASCII字符。它可以有数百行，例如：



G\PN：我的程序：

G\TA：测试说明;

T-1\TID：测试5;

T-1 \RF1：5;



有八种标识符分类，G和T是两种，只是显示。



会有是一个ASCII CSV（逗号分隔值）文件，用于定义每个允许的标识符。到目前为止，我计划将其加载到STD :: MAP中。在读取TMATS文件时，每个标识符都会被解析，查找，并检查所有选项。



我想要一个单独的： Window /对于每个分类，dialog / sdi /< some type =of =display => / etc 。用户将能够选择每个组并查看数据。大多数分类都需要滚动才能查看所有项目。如果有错误，用户将能够更正数据并写出新文件。



一次只能打开一个TMATS文件。 />


您对此项目建议使用哪种类型的项目/应用程序？

Visual Studio 2008, Win 7, C++

I want to create an application to validate a TMATS file. It is a text based file, limited the basic ASCII characters. It can have hundreds of lines such as:

G\PN:My Program:
G\TA:Test Description;
T-1\TID:Test 5;
T-1\RF1:5;

There are eight classifications of identifiers, G and T are two, just shown.

There will be an ASCII CSV (Comma Separated Values) file that defines each allowed identifier. So far, I plan to load that into an STD::MAP. As the TMATS file is read each identifier is parsed out, looked up, and all the options checked.

I would like to have a separate: Window/dialog/sdi/<some type="" of="" display="">/etc for each of the classifications. The user will be able to select each of the groups and view the data. Most of the classifications will require scrolling to view all the items. If there are errors, the user will be able correct the data and write a new file out.

There will be only one TMATS file open at a time.

What type of project/application do you suggest for this project?

推荐答案

引用：

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov - 22小时前

C ++ / CLI项目怎么样？你能用这个基于C ++的语言进行.NET开发吗？

Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov - 22 hrs ago
How about C++/CLI projects? Will you be able to use this C++-based language for .NET development?

据我所知，当然。 CLI提供了哪些优于MFC的优势？我会寻找一些答案。



注意：我认为C＃与XAML一样，概念看起来不错。但后来看到C＃中没有按位运算符。在遥测中，我必须坚持使用C ++。



编辑：我刚刚在C ++ / CLI上发现了几篇文章。有一些语法更改，一些垃圾收集，但根本没有范例更改。 GUI中没有任何变化，I / O概念中没有任何变化。除非有人有充分的理由弹出，否则我会坚持使用标准的C ++。



我倾向于对话模型而不是SDI模型。显示短语并且能够编辑每个短语似乎更容易。我仍然持不同意见。



感谢您的时间。

To my knowledge, sure. What advantage does CLI provide over MFC? I will look for some answers.

Note: I considered C# with XAML, the concept looks good. But then saw that there are no bitwise operators in C#. In telemetry that is a must so I will stick with C++.

I just found a couple of articles on C++/CLI. There are some syntax changes, some garbage collection, but no paradigm change at all. No change in the GUI, nothing in I/O concepts. Unless someone pops up with a good reason, I''ll stick with standard C++.

I am leaning towards the dialog model rather than the SDI model. It appears easier to display the short phrases and to be able to edit each. I remain open to differing opinion.

Thanks for your time.

这篇关于建议Visual Studio项目的类型的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！