Subversion客户端/服务器选择哪一个 [英] Subversion client/server which one to choose
问题描述
大家好，
关于版本控制系统，在阅读了很多有关GIT的内容后，我决定继续进行Subversion，我认为这可能很有趣，但是允许我编程机器的工业软件仅与Subversion兼容. ..这里没有真正的选择.
现在，情况正在发生变化，同时我想保持与旧版本控制系统的兼容性，我将能够开始使用Visual Studio作为开发环境.由于现在发生这种情况，因此我不受任何特定客户的束缚.
现在我有两个问题:
1.我已经在APACHE站点中看到有一些不同的选项可以用作Subversion服务器:
•CollabNet(由CollabNet支持和认证；需要注册)
•SlikSVN(32位和64位客户端MSI；由SharpSvn项目的Bert Huijben维护)
•VisualSVN(客户端和服务器；由VisualSVN支持和维护)
•WANdisco(32位和64位客户端和服务器；由WANdisco支持和认证)
•Win32Svn(32位客户端，服务器和绑定，MSI和ZIP；由David Darj维护)
它们之间有什么区别?
2.使用Visual Studio时，您的建议是什么?
我已经将ankhsvn视为一个不错的选择，但我从未使用过它，也不知道其优缺点.
我一直在与Tortoise一起工作，但我很高兴，但是我对Ankhsvn有什么期望?这将是优势，并且那里有其他软件吗?
与往常一样，先谢谢您. :thumbsup:
Hello all,
In terms of version control system I''ve decided to continue with subversion, after reading about GIT a lot I''ve thought that it can be interesting, but the industrial software that allows me to program machines is compatible only with subversion so... there is not a real choice here.
Now, things are changing, and meanwhile I want to maintain the compatibility with the old version control system, I''ll be able to start using visual studio as the development environment. As this is happening now I''m not tied to any specific client.
Now my two questions:
1. I''ve seen in the APACHE site that there are some different options as subversion server:
• CollabNet (supported and certified by CollabNet; requires registration)
• SlikSVN (32- and 64-bit client MSI; maintained by Bert Huijben, SharpSvn project)
• VisualSVN (client and server; supported and maintained by VisualSVN)
• WANdisco (32- and 64-bit client and server; supported and certified by WANdisco)
• Win32Svn (32-bit client, server and bindings, MSI and ZIPs; maintained by David Darj)
Which are the differences between them?
2. When working with Visual Studio, what would be your recommendation?
I''ve seen ankhsvn as a good option, but I''ve never used it and I don''t know pros and cons.
I''ve been working with Tortoise and I''m quite happy, but what can I expect from Ankhsvn? which would be the advantages and are other softwares there?
As always, thank you in advance. :thumbsup:
推荐答案
在这里查看我在Git上的帖子: ^ ]
至于SVN，通常在客户端使用TortoiseSVN就足够了，我使用过Ankhsvn，它也非常好(尽管它需要完整的VS版本，并且不能在Express上运行)，选择哪个是个人喜好问题. >
服务器端毫无疑问，VisualSVN是最好的，易于安装和运行.
Take a look at my post on Git here : http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4243086/Git.aspx[^]
As for SVN, on the clients side usually TortoiseSVN is sufficient, I have used Ankhsvn and it is very good also (although it requires full VS versions and will not work on Express), choosing which is a matter of personal preference.
Server side there is no question in my mind VisualSVN is the best, easy to install and run.
这篇关于Subversion客户端/服务器选择哪一个的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
