用于仿真的最佳C ++编译器 [英] Best C++ compiler for the simulations

查看:134
本文介绍了用于仿真的最佳C ++编译器的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

大家好!

我想运行由C ++中的多线程技术编写的复杂的机器人仿真
您介意向我介绍不会降低我的代码性能的最佳编译器吗?
我听说过一些有关code :: blocks和eclipse的信息.但是有些人认为日食很慢!
您怎么看?????????????????????????????????????????其中.我建议您花更多的精力来确保源代码高效并减少对编译器的担心.


由于您只是最近才问过使用Java或C ++的问题,我认为您还没有编写代码了.话虽如此,我的建议是GCC,据我所知,它是最接近标准的编译器,包括新的C ++ 11功能.您可能会发现其中一些功能对您的项目很有帮助!

正如Jochen Arndt所指出的那样,Code :: Blocks和Eclipse只是IDE,而不是编译器:如果需要,您可以将GCC与它们中的任何一个一起使用.


Hi everyone!

I would like to run my complicated robot simulations which are written by multithreading technics in C++
would you mind introducing me the best compiler which does not decrease my code performance???

I''ve heard something about code::blocks and eclipse. but some persons believe that eclipse is very slow!
what do you think????

解决方案

Given the quality of most modern compilers it''s unlikely that you could tell the difference between the object code produced by any of them. I would suggest you spend more effort making sure your source code is efficient and worry less about the compiler.


Since you only recently asked about using Java or C++, I assume you haven''t written the code yet. Having said that, my suggestion would be GCC, as to my knowledge it''s the compiler closest to the standards, including the new C++11 features. You may find some of those features quite helpful in your project!

As Jochen Arndt pointed out, Code::Blocks and Eclipse are just IDEs, not compilers: you can use GCC with either if you want.


这篇关于用于仿真的最佳C ++编译器的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆