如果文章未指定许可证，则暗含什么许可证 [英] What license is implied if an article does not specify a license

问题描述

我想使用一个商业项目中的文章中存在的代码，问题是作者没有指定他想与该代码关联的许可证.

建议与作者联系以澄清许可证，在这种特定情况下，会有许多消息询问相同的问题，但从未得到答复.

没有许可证的文章是否默认为The Code Project Open License(CPOL)，还是不安全地承担此责任?

在这里的任何帮助，将不胜感激.

Ergin salih

I want to use some code present in an article in a commercial project, the problem is that the author has not specified the license he wants to associate with the code.

The suggestion is to contact the author to clarify the license, in this specific case there are a number of messages asking the same question but it has never been answered.

Does an article without a license default to the The Code Project Open License (CPOL) or is it not safe to assume this.

Any help here would be appreciated.

Ergin salih

推荐答案

它是CPOL.各个许可证的说明可在此处找到:

许可说明 [ ^ ]

It''s CPOL. The descriptions of each license are found here:

License Descriptions[^]

这篇关于如果文章未指定许可证，则暗含什么许可证的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！