RichFaces与PrimeFaces(性能) [英] RichFaces Vs PrimeFaces (for performance)

问题描述

我正在使用JSF 2.0，并且我正在寻找一种性能方面负载最小的辅助组件库.如果我可以在RichFaces和PrimeFaces之间进行选择，那么哪个更好用?两者的优点和缺点是什么?

I am using JSF 2.0 and I am looking for a copmponent library with minimal load in terms of performance. Which one is better to use if I have choice between RichFaces and PrimeFaces? What are the advantages and disadvantages of both?

推荐答案

目前，Primefaces是我所知道的(到目前为止)唯一具有完整JSF2实现的组件库.存在错误和问题，并且某些组件需要重写，但是开发速度很快，沟通非常好(我不记得他们的支持论坛上有一篇帖子，而Cagatay自己也没有回答)，并且它朝着正确的方向发展(新的主题系统就是该恕我直言的一个例子).我认为，到今年年底，Primefaces将成为成熟的JSF2组件库.

Currently Primefaces is the only component lib that I know of (for now) that has a complete JSF2 implementation. There are bugs and problems, and some components are to be rewritten, but development is lightning fast, the communication is excellent (I don't remember a single post on their support forum that hasn't been answered by Cagatay himself), and it is moving in the right direction (the new theming system is an example of that IMHO). I think Primefaces will be a mature JSF2 component lib by the end of the year.

还有一些其他东西，例如我玩过很短时间的Icefaces，但是它们进展缓慢，而且就像我说的那样，它们中的任何一个都不是真正的JSF2.造成这种情况的部分原因是，Sun参考实现Mojarra的bug很大，并且这些组件库开发人员正等待修复这些严重的bug.

There are some others, like Icefaces that I played with for a short time, but they are moving slowly and like I said, none of them are really JSF2 yet. Part of the reason for this is that Mojarra, the Sun reference implementation is quite buggy, and there some serious bugs that these component lib developers are waiting for to get fixed.

因此，我目前的投票肯定是在Primefaces上，稍后我们将看到它的样子.

So my vote is definitely on Primefaces for now, we'll see how it will look like later.

这篇关于RichFaces与PrimeFaces(性能)的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！