Java Server Faces 2.0或Tapestry 5.2? [英] Java Server Faces 2.0 or Tapestry 5.2?

问题描述

有没有最新的文章比较JSF 2和Tap 5?我似乎找到的所有东西都是在比较JSF 1.2和Tap4.

Are there any up to date articles comparing JSF 2 and Tap 5? Everything I seem to find is comparing JSF 1.2 and Tap4.

有人对T5或JSF2有任何经验并且有时间传福音吗?

Does anyone have any experience with T5 or JSF2 and time to evangelize one or the other?

我正在寻找Hibernate和mySql之上的Java快速开发框架.

I'm looking for a framework for rapid development in Java, on top of Hibernate and mySql.

其他框架的销售方式已被接受，但JSF2和T5当前是我们的首选.

Other framework sales pitches accepted, but JSF2 and T5 are currently our top picks.

推荐答案

接受您的提议并推销另一个Framework:

如果您想真正快速开发，则应查看播放框架

If you want really rapid development then you should look at the Play Framework.

我使用过JSF/Richfaces/Seam/Hibernate等，我想说使用Play可以使您的工作效率提高一倍以上.没有部署周期.因此，没有开发人员停机. JPA/Hibernate诞生了，并且有许多插件将其功能扩展到其他方向.

I've used JSF/Richfaces/Seam/Hibernate etc and I'd say that using Play more than doubles your productivity. There are no deploy cycles. So no developer downtime. It's got JPA/Hibernate baked in and lots of plugins that extend it's functionality in other directions.

我也喜欢这样的事实，它使您的页面如此轻巧.我与JSF的最大问题始终是页面的重量(不必要的ID，大量表，客户端状态等)

I also like the fact that it makes your pages so lightweight. My biggest issue with JSF was always the weight of the pages (unecessary IDs, lots of tables, client state etc)

花点时间观看网络广播.

Take some time and view the webcast.

这篇关于Java Server Faces 2.0或Tapestry 5.2?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！