__metaclass__是否应该在Python中强制使用元类? [英] Shouldn't __metaclass__ force the use of a metaclass in Python?
问题描述
我一直在尝试学习Python中的元类.我掌握了主要思想,但似乎无法激活该机制.据我了解,在构造类K时,可以通过在全局或类级别将__metaclass__
设置为M来将M指定为元类.为了对此进行测试,我编写了以下程序:
I've been trying to learn about metaclasses in Python. I get the main idea, but I can't seem to activate the mechanism. As I understand it, you can specify M to be as the metaclass when constructing a class K by setting __metaclass__
to M at the global or class level. To test this out, I wrote the following program:
p = print
class M(type):
def __init__(*args):
type.__init__(*args)
print("The rain in Spain")
p(1)
class ClassMeta:
__metaclass__ = M
p(2)
__metaclass__ = M
class GlobalMeta: pass
p(3)
M('NotMeta2', (), {})
p(4)
但是,当我运行它时,会得到以下输出:
However, when I run it, I get the following output:
C:\Documents and Settings\Daniel Wong\Desktop>python --version
Python 3.0.1
C:\Documents and Settings\Daniel Wong\Desktop>python meta.py
1
2
3
The rain in Spain
4
我应该在1和2之后看不到西班牙的雨"吗?这是怎么回事?
Shouldn't I see "The rain in Spain" after 1 and 2? What's going on here?
推荐答案
在Python 3(您正在使用)中,元类由类定义中的关键字参数指定:
In Python 3 (which you are using) metaclasses are specified by a keyword parameter in the class definition:
class ClassMeta(metaclass=M):
pass
指定__metaclass__
类属性或全局变量是Python 2.x的旧语法,不再受支持.另请参见"Python 3的新增功能" 和 PEP 2115 .
Specifying a __metaclass__
class property or global variable is old syntax from Python 2.x and not longer supported. See also "What's new in Python 3" and PEP 2115.
这篇关于__metaclass__是否应该在Python中强制使用元类?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!