没有属性“属性".在验证w3c的facebook meta标签中 [英] there is no attribute "property" in facebook meta tag in validation w3c
问题描述
我们可以使用meta name="fb:admins"
代替
meta property="fb:admins"
用于w3c验证??
can we use the meta name="fb:admins"
instead of
meta property="fb:admins"
for w3c validation ??
推荐答案
尽管这是一个老问题，但我正在回答这个问题，因为我认为这对于将来希望获得此信息的人来说都是有价值的.埃文(Evan)说不会通过验证时可能是对的，但我认为答案是您想保留property=""属性.取自旧Facebook恰好与此问题有关的开发人员论坛帖子，事实证明您的文档应该是XHTML + RDFa文档.借助于DOCTYPE声明，这将在W3C中进行验证:
I'm answering this even though this is an old question since I think it's of value for whoever wants info on this in the future. Evan's probably right when he says it won't pass validation, but I think the answer is that you want to keep the property="" attribute. Taking from an old Facebook developer forum post concerning this question exactly it turns out your document should be an XHTML + RDFa document. This will validate in W3C, thanks to the DOCTYPE declaration:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML+RDFa 1.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/DTD/xhtml-rdfa-1.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
version="XHTML+RDFa 1.0"
xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#"
xml:lang="en">
<head>
<title>Virtual Library</title>
<meta property="og:title" content="My Website"/>
</head>
<body>
<p>Moved to <a href="http://example.org/">example.org</a>.</p>
</body>
</html>
您可以在 RDFa的W3C规范中找到更多信息，并在此<meta property=""/> 的特定示例.
You can find out more in in the W3C spec for RDFa, and in this specific example of <meta property=""/>.
这篇关于没有属性“属性".在验证w3c的facebook meta标签中的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
