苹果拒绝第三方注册 [英] Apple Rejection For Third Party Sign Up

查看:1316
本文介绍了苹果拒绝第三方注册的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

Apple Review团队有理由拒绝该申请

Apple Review team rejected the Application with the reason

"我们注意到您的应用程序使用了第三方登录服务,但不提供使用Apple登录的功能. "

"We noticed that your app uses a third-party login service but does not offer Sign in with Apple. "

即使应用程序也具有正常的注册过程以及电子邮件和密码.

Even Application have normal Signup process as well with Email and Password.

在iOS 13应用中必须具有Apple Signin登录吗?

Is it Mandatory to have Apple Signin in iOS 13 apps ?

推荐答案

更新3

App Store审查指南已更新,以涵盖同时使用第三方和自己的登录服务的案例.现在要求这些应用程序提供使用Apple登录.因此,我将更新我的应用程序以支持使用Apple登录",如果您属于此类,建议您这样做.

The App Store Review Guidelines have been updated to cover cases that use both third party and their own sign in services. Those apps are now required to offer Sign in with Apple. Therefore I'll be updating my apps to support Sign in with Apple and I recommend you do the same if you fall into this category.

原始答案:

所以我的应用程序由于完全相同的原因而被拒绝了.我的应用程序提供常规的电子邮件和密码身份验证以及Facebook和Google登录名.这是我在阅读《 App Store审查指南》时发现的一些有趣内容.

So my app just got rejected for the exact same reason. My app offers regular email and password authentication as well as Facebook and Google login. Here are a few interesting things that I found while reading the App Store Review Guidelines.

1.它说:

专有使用第三方或社交登录服务的应用(例如Facebook登录,Google登录,Twitter登录,LinkedIn登录,Amazon登录或微信登录) )以使用该应用程序设置或验证用户的主帐户,还必须提供使用Apple登录"作为等效选项.

Apps that exclusively use a third-party or social login service (such as Facebook Login, Google Sign-In, Sign in with Twitter, Sign In with LinkedIn, Login with Amazon, or WeChat Login) to set up or authenticate the user’s primary account with the app must also offer Sign in with Apple as an equivalent option.

但是我的应用程序不完全使用第三方或社交登录服务.它还使用我们自己的电子邮件/密码方法.实际上,电子邮件和密码方法居于首位,因此被认为是身份验证的主要方法.因此,我觉得此规则不适用于我的应用程序.

But my app does NOT EXCLUSIVELY use a third-part or social login service. It also uses our own email/ password method. In fact the email and password method is on top and thus assumed to be the main method of authentication. So I feel like this rule does not apply to my app.

2.它还说:

如果不需要,则无需使用Apple登录:

Sign in with Apple is not required if:

您的应用程序专有地使用您公司自己的帐户设置和登录系统...

Your app exclusively uses your company’s own account setup and sign-in systems...

3.前2条规则未涵盖我的应用程序的情况.

我的应用程序不完全使用第三方登录服务,也不完全使用我们自己的方法.它同时使用.因此,既不需要与Apple一起实施登录,也无需豁免实施.

My app does NOT EXCLUSIVELY use third-party login services and does NOT EXCLUSIVELY use our own method. It uses both. So it's neither required to implement the Sign in with Apple nor exempt from implementing it.

4.我在同一天以完全相同的身份验证方法提交了2个应用程序供审核,但其中只有一个被拒绝.

昨天我提交了2个应用程序进行审查,这些应用程序属于同一项目,并且具有与身份验证屏幕设计完全相同的身份验证方法.他们俩都在同一时间接受了审查.第一个由于未实现与Apple的登录而被批准,第二个被拒绝.好笑吧?

Yesterday I submitted 2 apps for review that are part of the same project and have the exact same authentication methods with the exact same auth screen design. They both got in review at the same time. The first one got approved and the second one got rejected for not implementing Sign in with Apple. Funny, right?

因此,除非他们更新审阅指南以涵盖您同时使用两种身份验证方法的情况,否则我相信我们不会违反任何规则.我试图与审核小组争辩说,我拒绝的应用程序没有违反《 App Store审核指南》,因此他们不应该拒绝它.

So unless they update the Review Guidelines to cover a case where you use both methods of authentication I believe we are not violating any rule. I'm trying to argue with the review team that my rejected app does not violate the App Store Review Guidelines and they should not have rejected it.

此问题得到解决后,我将更新我的答案,但在此之前,如果面临相同问题的其他人将其告知审核小组可能会有所帮助.我们要么胜诉,要么让我们的应用获得批准,否则他们将更新其审核指南以涵盖我们的案例.无论哪种方式,将来都会对其他人有所帮助.

I'll update my answer when this get's resolved but till then it might actually help if others who face the same issue point this out to the review team. We'll either win our case and get our apps approved or they'll update their Review Guidelines to cover our case. Either way it'll be helpful for others in the future.

更新1

Apple有点理解这是不对的,并且我的应用程序状态从二进制拒绝"更改为正在审核".现在,我在等他们的决定.

Apple kinda understood that this is not right and my app's status changed from Binary Rejected to In Review. Now I'm waiting to see what they decide.

更新2

经过大约40个小时的审核"后,我的应用终于获得批准,现已准备出售".我不敢相信,但最终感觉就像是有人在听着并理解了我的论点.

After about 40 hours of being "In Review" my app finally got approved and is now "Ready for Sale". I can't believe it, but it finally feels like someone listened and understood the arguments that I made.

这篇关于苹果拒绝第三方注册的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆