我为什么要使用"service sshd reload"?优先于"service sshd restart"? [英] Why would I use "service sshd reload" in preference to "service sshd restart"?

问题描述

从我在Linux上进行的测试看来，

From my tests on Linux, it seems like

service sshd reload

• 仅在sshd已经运行时起作用
• 如果sshd_config文件有问题，请停止sshd
• 即使sshd_config文件有问题，也返回错误代码0

• Only works when sshd is already running
• Stops sshd if the sshd_config file has problems
• Returns error code 0 even if the sshd_config file has problems

service sshd restart

• 不管sshd是否已在运行，都可以工作
• 如果sshd_config文件语法无效或存在其他问题，请停止sshd
• 如果sshd_config文件有问题，则返回非零错误代码

• Works regardless of whether sshd is already running
• Stops sshd if the sshd_config file has invalid syntax or other problems
• Returns non-zero error code if the sshd_config file has problems

我知道他们正在执行不同的操作，但是对我来说，我应该始终使用service sshd restart似乎毫无道理.在某些情况下为什么最好使用service sshd reload?

I understand that they are performing different operations, but it seems to me a no brainer that I should always use service sshd restart. Are there any reasons why service sshd reload is preferable in some situations?

推荐答案

当您运行 service sshd 命令时，其中的 opt 可能会被重新加载/重新启动，它实际上会运行一个程序具有这样的修改后的环境:

When you run the service sshd command where opt could be reload/restart it actually runs a program with a modified enviroment just like this:

    env -i PATH="$PATH" TERM="$TERM" "${SERVICEDIR}/${SERVICE}" ${OPTIONS}

例如:

    env -i PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin TERM=xterm /etc/init.d/sshd reload

在两种情况下(重新启动/重新加载)，sshd命令都执行几乎相同的操作:

The sshd command does almost the same thing in both cases (restart/reload):

重新加载:尝试终止发送HUP信号的进程，正如您在摘录中看到的那样，它需要进程的PID来执行此操作. (不管sshd是否已在运行，都可以运行)

reload: Tries to kill the process sending a HUP signal, and as you can see on the snipet it needs the PID of the process to do it. (Works regardless of whether sshd is already running)

    reload()
    {
        echo -n $"Reloading $prog: "
        if [ -n "`pidfileofproc $SSHD`" ] ; then
             killproc $SSHD -HUP
        else
             failure $"Reloading $prog"
        fi
        RETVAL=$?
        echo
    }

重新启动:就像执行stop-> start一样.

restart: It would just do the same as if you were to execute a stop->start.

    restart() {
        stop
        start
    }

    start()
    {
         [ -x $SSHD ] || exit 5
         [ -f /etc/ssh/sshd_config ] || exit 6
         # Create keys if necessary
         if [ "x${AUTOCREATE_SERVER_KEYS}" != xNO ]; then
              do_rsa1_keygen
              do_rsa_keygen
              do_dsa_keygen
         fi

         echo -n $"Starting $prog: "
         $SSHD $OPTIONS && success || failure
         RETVAL=$?
         [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ] && touch $lockfile
         echo
         return $RETVAL
    }

    stop()
    {
         echo -n $"Stopping $prog: "
         if [ -n "`pidfileofproc $SSHD`" ] ; then
             killproc $SSHD
         else
         failure $"Stopping $prog"
         fi
         RETVAL=$?
         # if we are in halt or reboot runlevel kill all running sessions
         # so the TCP connections are closed cleanly
         if [ "x$runlevel" = x0 -o "x$runlevel" = x6 ] ; then
             trap '' TERM
             killall $prog 2>/dev/null
             trap TERM
         fi
         [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ] && rm -f $lockfile
         echo
    }

这篇关于我为什么要使用"service sshd reload"?优先于"service sshd restart"?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！