Pandas iloc vs直接切片? [英] Pandas iloc vs direct slicing?
问题描述
我已经阅读了很多有关iloc vs loc的讨论,我理解了两者之间的区别,但是我不明白的是两者之间的区别是什么
I've read a lot of discussion about iloc vs loc and I understand the difference but what I don't understand is what's the difference between:
indexed_data['var'][0:10]
vs
indexed_data['var'].iloc[0:10]
这些似乎是同一件事,并提供相同的输出.
These seem to be the same thing and give the same output.
我错过了什么吗?谢谢!
Am I missing something? Thanks!
推荐答案
在熊猫的最新版本中,此功能适用于ix
函数.
In last versions of pandas this was work for ix
function.
但是从pandas 0.20+开始, ix索引器是不推荐使用.
But from pandas 0.20+ ix indexer is deprecated.
因此,将get_loc
用于var
列的位置,并仅使用iloc
进行选择:
So use get_loc
for position of var
column and select with iloc
only:
indexed_data.iloc[0:10, df.columns.get_loc('var')]
我认为两者之间的区别:
In my opinion difference between:
indexed_data['var'][0:10]
和:
indexed_data['var'].iloc[0:10]
主要在][
中.我认为最好是避免使用它,因为可能chaining indexing
.
is mainly in ][
. I think the best is avoid it because possible chaining indexing
.
Tom Augspurger(熊猫开发者)的现代熊猫获得建议:
一个粗略的规则是,只要您看到背对背的方括号] [",便表示自己在寻求麻烦.将其替换为
.loc[..., ...]
,您将被设置.
The rough rule is any time you see back-to-back square brackets, ][, you're in asking for trouble. Replace that with a
.loc[..., ...]
and you'll be set.
所以最好是使用本地熊猫函数,例如loc
,iloc
.
So the best is use native pandas function like loc
, iloc
here.
然后尝试比较每个方法调用的函数,但是在40分钟后我将其停止(确实调用了很多函数).
Then try compare functions called for each method but after one 40 minutes I stop it (really a lot of function is called).
我检查了时间,并且每个功能都不相同:
I check timings and are different for each function:
indexed_data = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randint(3, size=(2000000,1)), columns=['var'])
In [151]: %timeit indexed_data['var'].iloc[0:100000]
10000 loops, best of 3: 62.1 µs per loop
In [152]: %timeit indexed_data['var'][0:100000]
10000 loops, best of 3: 82.3 µs per loop
In [153]: %timeit indexed_data.iloc[0:100000, indexed_data.columns.get_loc('var')]
10000 loops, best of 3: 155 µs per loop
In [154]: %timeit indexed_data.loc[indexed_data.index[0:100000], 'var']
100 loops, best of 3: 7.36 ms per loop
#numpy approach - output is array
In [155]: %timeit indexed_data['var'].values[0:100000]
100000 loops, best of 3: 5.35 µs per loop
这篇关于Pandas iloc vs直接切片?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!