在Popen中合并stdout和stderr [英] Merge stdout and stderr in Popen
本文介绍了在Popen中合并stdout和stderr的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
在Ruby的popen/spawn中,如何将STDOUT和STDERR合并为单个流而又不使用>2&1
?
In Ruby's popen/spawn, how do I merge both STDOUT and STDERR as a single stream wihthout resorting to using >2&1
?
在Python中,这将是:
In Python, this would be:
>>> import subprocess
>>> subprocess.check_output('my_prog args', stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, shell=True)
请注意stderr
参数.
我使用Open3 -因为我不想 just stdout-但它已经将它们分为两个流.
I use Open3 - as I don't want just stdout - but it already separates them into two streams.
推荐答案
Using the code from your other question, here you go:
cmd = 'a_prog --arg ... --arg2 ...'
Open3.popen2({"MYVAR" => "a_value"}, "#{cmd}", {:err => [:child, :out]}) { |i,o|
# This output should include stderr as well
output = o.read()
repr = "$ #{cmd}\n#{output}"
}
一些更改:
-
popen2
的第三个参数会将stderr重定向到stdoutl.请注意,它必须是生成的进程的标准输出,而不是系统范围的标准输出,因此您需要指定:child
的:out
- 您需要使用
.popen2
而不是.popen3
,因为如果为stderr包含第三个e
选项,则似乎忽略了重定向 - 由于您使用的是
.popen2
,因此只能将|i,o|
传递给块:
- The third parameter to
popen2
will redirect stderr to stdoutl. Note that it needs to be the spawned process's stdout, not the system-wide stdout, so you need to specify:child
's:out
- You need to use
.popen2
instead of.popen3
as it seems the redirection is ignored if you include the 3rde
option for stderr - Because you're using
.popen2
, you only pass|i,o|
to the block:
这篇关于在Popen中合并stdout和stderr的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!
查看全文