VS2010 Scrum v1.0与MSF for Agile软件开发v5.0或后者之间的差异是超集吗？ [英] Difference between VS2010 Scrum v1.0 vs MSF for Agile software development v5.0 or the latter is the superset?

问题描述

Visual Studio Scrum 1.0和
之间的区别有多重要？ MSF for Agile Software Development v5.0流程模板？

How significant are the differences between Visual Studio Scrum 1.0 & MSF for Agile Software Development v5.0 process templates?

有人用过吗？

我们由于MS提出了目前正在使用外部工具（ TRAC ）在我们的开发过程中实施Scrum的问题在TFS2010中的其他过程指导中，这2件事使我感到困惑！

We are currently using external tools (TRAC) for implementing Scrum in our development process, since MS came up with additional process guidance in TFS2010, these 2 things confuse me to the core!

不确定，采用哪一个！

推荐答案

您并不孤单！我们都使用了两者，错误地从MSF Agile 5.0模板开始。如果您专门使用Scrum，我将使用Scrum 1.0模板。 Scrum 1.0模板是由Scrum的创始人之一Ken Schwaber创建的。

You're not alone! We have used both, mistakenly starting with the MSF Agile 5.0 template. If you are using Scrum specifically, I would use the Scrum 1.0 template. The Scrum 1.0 template was created with Ken Schwaber, one of the founders of Scrum.

MSF Agile 5.0模板包含一些工作簿，这些工作簿允许使用excel对报告数据进行大量控制。但是，还有很多缺点。没有发布燃尽报告。为了产生可用的sprint消耗，您需要在任务中记录实际值。产品积压很难保持。用户故事是唯一的待办事项，因此跟踪工程高峰或非功能性要求很尴尬。

The MSF Agile 5.0 Template contains workbooks which allow a lot of control over reporting data using excel. But, there's many more disadvantages. It doesn't have a release burndown report. In order to produce a usable sprint burndown, you need to record actuals in your tasks. The product backlog is hard to keep groomed. The user story is the only backlog item, so tracking engineering spikes or non functional requirements are awkward.

Sprint 1.0使用 Sprint工作项类型，可产生速度和消耗

The Sprint 1.0 uses a "Sprint" workitem type which makes velocity and burndowns a snap.

因此，就工具而言，这还不错。

So, as far as tools go, it's pretty good.

这篇关于VS2010 Scrum v1.0与MSF for Agile软件开发v5.0或后者之间的差异是超集吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！