是“ proc”还是“ proc”？需要有条件的before_action / before_filter吗？ [英] Is "proc" required with conditional before_action/before_filter?

问题描述

看，一个 before_filter ：

class ThingController < ApplicationController
  before_filter :check_stuff, :if => proc {Rails.env.production?}
end

在最近的代码审查中，我有人问，是否需要 proc 才能正常工作？ 答案似乎是是，但这是一个合理的问题，并且我打算通过参考Rails文档或指南或使用 before_filter （现在为 before_action ）。

During a recent code review, I was asked, "Is the proc is required for this to work?" The answer appears to be 'yes', but it's a reasonable question, and I had intended to answer it by referring to the Rails docs or guides or something on the use of conditionals with before_filter (now an alias of before_action).

我找不到任何东西。 动作控制器指南提到：only / ：除了，但不包括：if / ：除非。

I couldn't find any. The Action Controller Guide mentions :only/:except, but not :if/:unless.

失败了，我可以指出的代码中是否有涵盖此内容的地方？在此处进行了简短提及。有关如何处理：only 和：except 而不是：if 或：除非。

Failing that, is there somewhere in the code I can point to that covers this? It's mentioned briefly here, but that's more about how :only and :except are handled, rather than :if or :unless.

推荐答案

在Rails上找到它指南： http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_callbacks.html#conditional-callbacks

Found it on Rails Guides: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_callbacks.html#conditional-callbacks

并非总是需要 Proc 才能工作。

Turns out a Proc isn't always required for it to work.

：if 和：除非选项，其中可以包含符号，字符串， Proc 或 Array 。

the :if and :unless options, which can take a symbol, a string, a Proc or an Array.

因此，在您的情况下，您可能会逃脱

So in your case you could probably get away with

before_action :check_stuff, if: "Rails.env.production?"

在Rails文档中查找内容有时会很麻烦，但是至少这样的问题使事情更容易由于StackOverflow索引编制正确且搜索排名较高，因此可以随时查找。

Finding things in Rails documentation can be a pain sometimes, but at least questions like this make things easier to find over time since StackOverflow is well indexed and has high search rankings.

这篇关于是“ proc”还是“ proc”？需要有条件的before_action / before_filter吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！