Poisson MLE的手卷R代码 [英] hand-rolled R code for Poisson MLE

查看:122
本文介绍了Poisson MLE的手卷R代码的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我正在尝试编写自己的函数,以了解泊松分布在最大似然估计框架(适用于GLM)中的行为.

I'm attempting to write my own function to understand how the Poisson distribution behaves within a Maximum Likelihood Estimation framework (as it applies to GLM).

我熟悉R的便捷glm函数,但想尝试手动滚动一些代码以了解发生了什么事情:

I'm familiar with R's handy glm function, but wanted to try and hand-roll some code to understand what's going on:

n <- 10000 # sample size
b0 <- 1.0 # intercept
b1 <- 0.2 # coefficient
x <- runif(n=n, min=0, max=1.5) # generate covariate values
lp <- b0+b1*x # linear predictor
lambda <- exp(lp) # compute lamda
y <- rpois(n=n, lambda=lambda) # generate y-values
dta <- data.frame(y=y, x=x) # generate dataset
negloglike <- function(lambda) {n*lambda-sum(x)*log(lambda) + sum(log(factorial(y)))} # build negative log-likelihood
starting.vals <- c(0,0) # one starting value for each parameter
pars <- c(b0, b1)
maxLike <- optim(par=pars,fn=negloglike, data = dta) # optimize

当我输入maxLike时,我的R输出如下:

My R output when I enter maxLike is the following:

Error in fn(par, ...) : unused argument (data = list(y = c(2, 4....

我假设我在函数中未正确指定optim,但是我对MLE的细节或受约束的优化不够熟悉,无法理解我所缺少的内容.

I assume I've specified optim within my function incorrectly, but I'm not familiar enough with the nuts-and-bolts of MLE or constrained optimization to understand what I'm missing.

推荐答案

optim只能以某种方式使用您的函数.假定函数中的第一个参数将参数作为向量.如果您需要将其他信息传递给该函数(在您的情况下为数据),则需要将该信息作为函数的参数.您的negloglike函数没有data参数,这就是它所抱怨的.编码的方式不需要一个编码,因此您可以通过仅删除optim调用中的data = dat部分来解决问题,但我没有对此进行测试.这是为泊松(而非glm)做一个简单的MLE的一个小例子.

optim can only use your function in a certain way. It assumes the first parameter in your function takes in the parameters as a vector. If you need to pass other information to this function (in your case the data) you need to have that as a parameter of your function. Your negloglike function doesn't have a data parameter and that's what it is complaining about. The way you have it coded you don't need one so you probably could fix your problem by just removing the data=dat part of your call to optim but I didn't test that. Here is a small example of doing a simple MLE for just a poisson (not the glm)

negloglike_pois <- function(par, data){
  x <- data$x
  lambda <- par[1]

  -sum(dpois(x, lambda, log = TRUE))
}

dat <- data.frame(x = rpois(30, 5))
optim(par = 4, fn = negloglike_pois, data = dat)
mean(dat$x)

> optim(par = 4, fn = negloglike_pois, data = dat)
$par
[1] 4.833594

$value
[1] 65.7394

$counts
function gradient 
      22       NA 

$convergence
[1] 0

$message
NULL

Warning message:
In optim(par = 4, fn = negloglike_pois, data = dat) :
  one-dimensional optimization by Nelder-Mead is unreliable:
use "Brent" or optimize() directly
> # The "true" MLE. We didn't hit it exactly but came really close
> mean(dat$x)
[1] 4.833333

这篇关于Poisson MLE的手卷R代码的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆