选择简单Apache Synapse与WSO2的标准 [英] Criteria for choosing simple Apache Synapse Vs WSO2

问题描述

在评估各种ESB时，我遇到了Apache Synapse& WSO2.在WSO2中，提到了WSO2完全使用Synapse并基于它构建.

While evaluating various ESB's, I came across Apache Synapse & WSO2. In WSO2 it's mentioned that WSO2 completely uses Synapse and built on top of it.

但是，我仍然不清楚WSO2在Synapse上提供哪些附加功能? (除了商业支持).

However I am not still clear what additional features does WSO2 offer over Synapse? (Apart from commercial support).

我可以看到的一个区别是用于管理代理定义，序列创建等的WebUI.WSO2是否在Synapse上提供了其他功能?另外，请分享在Synpase和amp ;;之间是否有任何指导原则可供选择. WSO2

One difference I could see is the web UI to manage proxy definitions, sequences creation etc. Are there any other features which WSO2 provides over Synapse? Also please share if there are any guidelines to choose between Synpase & WSO2

我只是想确定为什么我要通过Synapse进入WSO2.

I just wanted to be sure why I am going to WSO2 over Synapse.

谢谢， 赶快

推荐答案

WSO2 ESB在突触之上提供了许多出色的功能.我在这里列出了一些.

WSO2 ESB offer many great features on top of synapse. I am listing few here.

• 图形管理控制台，用于创建/管理/监视代理/API和服务.
• 支持多种运输方式[1].
• 统计，日志和审核支持
• 支持多种内容类型
• 并且行业接受了公认的性能.

列表可以继续.因此，我指的是有关功能[2​​]的WSO2文档.希望你能从那里得到一些想法.

List can go on and on. Hence I am referring you to WSO2 documentation on features[2]. Hope you can get some idea from there.

[1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB481/ESB +运输

[2] https://docs.wso2.com/display/ESB481/Features

这篇关于选择简单Apache Synapse与WSO2的标准的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！