将设置对不同域的地址的回复会导致垃圾邮件 [英] Will Setting a Reply To Address at a Different Domain Result in Spam

问题描述

我代表客户从我的应用程序发送交易电子邮件.我希望接收者能够单击回复，并将回复直接发送给我的客户，而无需接触我的服务器.

I send transactional emails from my application on my customers behalf. I'd like for the receiver to be able to click reply and have the reply go directly to my customer, without ever touching my server.

如果我从[e-mail]发送电子邮件，并将回复标头设置为[e-mail]，我的交易电子邮件会被标记为垃圾邮件吗?这甚至是垃圾邮件过滤器的最危险信号吗?重要的是，我的电子邮件不会被夹在垃圾邮件文件夹中，并且我花了很多时间来确保我的电子邮件能够正确发送，因此我只想确定在执行类似操作之前.还是这是我不应该担心的相当普遍的习惯?

If I send an email from [e-mail] with the reply-to header set to [e-mail] will my transactional emails be flagged as spam? Is this even the slightest red flag to spam filters? It's important my emails don't get caught in the spam folder and i've spent quite a bit of time ensuring that my email is sent properly so I just want to be sure before I implement something like that. Or is this a fairly common practice that I shouldn't be concerned at all about?

推荐答案

我能够在其他位置找到答案 http://www.quora.com/Does-sending-电子邮件的发件人地址来自不同的域，该地址来自被伤害的地址可传递性

I was able to find the answer at another location http://www.quora.com/Does-sending-emails-with-a-From-address-with-a-different-domain-from-the-Reply-To-address-hurt-ones-deliverability

显然，可以将回复标头设置为另一个域，而不会对电子邮件的可传递性造成任何威胁.在某些较小的邮件管理员中，这可能会引起问题，但从技术上讲，这是完全合法的.

Apparently the reply-to header can be set to another domain without any threat to the deliverability of the email. On some of the smaller mail admins this may cause a problem, but technically speaking its perfectly legitimate.

这篇关于将设置对不同域的地址的回复会导致垃圾邮件的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！