具有伪锚和重复内容/SEO的网址 [英] Url with pseudo anchors and duplicate content / SEO

问题描述

我有一个产品页面，在选择列表中有选项(例如:产品的颜色等). 您使用不同的网址加入了我的产品:

I have a product page with options in select list (ex : color of the product etc...). You accede to my product with different urls :

• www.mysite.com/product_1.html
• www.mysite.com/product_1.html#/color-green

如果您使用网址www.mysite.com/product_1.html#/color-green，则会自动选择选择列表中的选项绿色(使用javascript).

If you accede with the url www.mysite.com/product_1.html#/color-green, the option green of the select list is automatically selected (with javascript).

如果我用这些网址链接我的产品页面，是否存在重复内容的风险?对我的seo有好处吗?

If i link my product page with those urls, is there a risk of duplicate content ? Is it good for my seo ? thx

推荐答案

有一次，我看到Google索引了#ed URL的奇数并将其显示在结果中，但是持续时间不长.我认为这还需要在锚点上有一个页面链接.

At one time I saw Google indexing the odd #ed URL and showing them in results, but it didn't last long. I think it also required that there was an on page link to the anchor.

Google确实支持hashbang(#！)概念作为做可索引锚的一种特定方式，并支持AJAX，这意味着不再考虑没有bang(！)的锚.

Google does support the concept of the hashbang (#!) as a specific way to do indexable anchors and support AJAX, which implies an anchor without the bang (!) will no longer be considered for indexing.

无论哪种方式，谷歌都不是愚蠢的.定位符的基本用途是移动到页面上的某个位置，即它是同一页面(重复的内容)，但位置不同.因此，Google将期望#ed URL包含相同的内容.他们为什么要惩罚您做#的用途?

Either way, Google is not stupid. The the basic use of the anchor is to move to a place on a page, i.e. it is the same page (duplicate content) but a different spot. So Google will expect a #ed URL to contain the same content. Why would they punish you for doing what the # is for?

什么是重复内容的风险".通常，重复内容带来的唯一现场风险是Google可能会浪费时间来抓取重复的页面，而不是专注于其他有价值的页面.由于Google会假设#是同一页面，因此更有可能不会尝试#ed URL.

And what is "the risk of duplicate content". Generally, the only onsite risk from duplicate content is Google may waste it's time crawling duplicate pages instead of focusing on other valuable pages. As Google will assume # is the same page it is more likely to not event try the #ed URL.

如果您担心的话，请实施规范标签，但请正确执行.我发现执行不良的问题比解决要解决的问题还要多.

If you're worried, implement the canonical tag, but do it right. I've seen more issues from implementing it badly than the supposed issues they are there to solve.

这篇关于具有伪锚和重复内容/SEO的网址的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！