为什么验证asp.net身份中的电话号码后注销? [英] Why Log out after verify phone number in asp.net identity?

查看:68
本文介绍了为什么验证asp.net身份中的电话号码后注销?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我在我的项目中使用asp.net Identity.在VerifyPhoneNumber视图中,当用户确认他的电话号码时,他被注销(.AspNetApplicationCookie已删除.我从资源"选项卡中检查了此选项). ManageController中的VerifyPhoneNumber操作代码:

I am using asp.net Identity in my project. In VerifyPhoneNumber view, when user confirm his phone number, he is logged out (.AspNetApplicationCookie is removed. I checked this from Resource tab inspect chrome).
Code of VerifyPhoneNumber action in ManageController:

if (!ModelState.IsValid)
{
    return View(model);
}
string phoneNumber = UserManager.GetPhoneNumber(User.Identity.GetUserId());
var result = await UserManager.ChangePhoneNumberAsync(User.Identity.GetUserId(), phoneNumber, model.Code);
if (result.Succeeded)
{
    var user = await UserManager.FindByIdAsync(User.Identity.GetUserId());
    if (user != null)
    {
        await SignInManager.SignInAsync(user, isPersistent: false, rememberBrowser: false);
    }
    ViewBag.Message = "Complete";
    return View();

}
// If we got this far, something failed, redisplay form
ModelState.AddModelError("", "something wrong!");
return View(model);

为什么会这样?

更新
我已将SecurityStampValidatorvalidateInterval设置为0.

Update
I have set validateInterval for SecurityStampValidator to 0.

推荐答案

ChangePhoneNumberAsync 哪个会导致Cookie过期或重新验证. 如果不需要,则必须从UserManager<TUser>类继承(创建CustomUserManager类),然后重写ChangePhoneNumberAsync方法.只需使用相同的代码,而无需UpdateSecurityStampInternal行.

Which causes the cookie expiration or re-validation. If you don't want it, you have to inherit from the UserManager<TUser> class (create your CustomUserManager class) and then override the ChangePhoneNumberAsync method. Just use the same code without the UpdateSecurityStampInternal line.

这篇关于为什么验证asp.net身份中的电话号码后注销?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆