boost中的path :: string()和path :: generic_string()有什么区别? [英] What is the difference between path::string() and path::generic_string() in boost?
问题描述
boost::path::string()
和boost::path::generic_string()
有什么区别,什么时候应该使用它们?
What is the difference between boost::path::string()
and boost::path::generic_string()
, and when should I use each of them?
推荐答案
This is clearly stated in the documentation; you need only read the documentation to gain knowledge and understanding. Please get into the habit of doing that, starting from now.
以以这取决于您,取决于您的需求!再次引用文档中的以下引用可能会有帮助&
Well, that's up to you, and depends on your needs! The following quotation, again from the documentation, may help…
[注:对于ISO/IEC 9945,不会发生转换,因为本机格式和通用格式相同.对于Windows,反斜线将转换为斜线--尾注]
[Note: For ISO/IEC 9945, no conversion occurs, since the native format and generic format are the same. For Windows, backslashes are converted to slashes --end note]
在日常使用中,您可以有效地说:
In day-to-day use, you can effectively say:
- 在Windows上,本机格式包含反斜杠,而通用格式包含反斜杠;
- 在Linux上,两种格式都有斜杠.
这篇关于boost中的path :: string()和path :: generic_string()有什么区别?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!