为什么不使用is_const类型特征将const引用视为const? [英] Why isn't a const reference considered const using the is_const type trait?

查看:110
本文介绍了为什么不使用is_const类型特征将const引用视为const?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我对以下代码感到惊讶:

I was rather surprised that the following code:

#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>

using namespace std;

int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
    cout << boolalpha << is_const<const float&>::value << endl;

    return 0;
 }

打印 false 。删除引用可以正常工作:

Prints false. Removing the reference works correctly:

#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>

using namespace std;

int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
    cout << boolalpha << is_const<remove_reference<const float&>::type>::value << endl;

    return 0;
 }

打印出 true

两者都是使用G ++版本的 g ++ -std = c ++ 11 test.cpp 编译的: / p>

Both were compiled with g++ -std=c++11 test.cpp, using G++ version:

g++ (Ubuntu 5.3.0-1ubuntu1~14.04) 5.3.0 20151204

考虑一下,我可以理解这里有两种类型:引用类型和被引用的类型。引用的类型为 const ,因此第二种情况很有意义。对于第一种情况,如果引用的类型为 const 或始终为 true ,我希望它返回,因为引用AFAIK不能重新分配。

Thinking about it, I can understand that there are two types in play here: the reference type and the type that is referenced. The type that is referenced is const, so the second case makes sense. For the first case, I would expect it to either return if the referenced type is const or always true instead, because references AFAIK can't be "reassigned".

为什么它返回 false

推荐答案

结果正确。

引用绝不是 const ,因为它们不能通过 cv认证。您的说法是正确的,因为它们无法重新分配(因此在某种意义上是不变的),但这与 const 限定的含义不同。

References are never const, because they cannot be cv-qualified. You are correct in saying that they cannot be reassigned (and are, as such, immutable in a sense), but that is not the same as being const-qualified.

如果纯粹由于所指对象 const <而得到 true / code>,那么在所有其他情况下,这将与 is_const 的含义完全不一致。例如考虑指针。 is_const< int const *> :: value 应该是什么?

If you got true purely because the referent is const, then that would be completely inconsistent with the meaning of is_const in all other cases. Consider, for example, pointers. What should is_const<int const*>::value be?

这篇关于为什么不使用is_const类型特征将const引用视为const?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆