使用rspec和capybara测试茧动态添加的字段 [英] Testing fields added dynamically by cocoon using rspec and capybara

问题描述

我想知道是否有人测试茧动态添加的字段？

I was wondering whether anybody tests fields that were dynamically added by cocoon?

这可以节省很多时间，但是动态添加的所有字段的ID和名称中都添加了很长的数字。这意味着我必须跳过页面上需要多个（一组）字段的测试。

It's a great little time saver but all of the fields that are added dynamically have really long numerics added to the ID and name. This means that I have to skip testing that requires more than one (set of) field(s) on the page.

推荐答案

也许首先使用 Capybara查找器。这样的事情：

Maybe using Capybara finders all, first and the selector input. Something like this:

visit new_resource_path
click_link "Add a Nested Resource"
first("input[name='nested_resource[name]']").set("Nested Resource")
click_button "submit"

或

visit new_resource_path
click_link "Add a Nested Resource"
click_link "Add a Nested resource"
all("input[name='nested_resource[name]']").each do |input|
  input.set("Nested Resource")
end
click_button "submit

这只是一种方法，我从未使用过茧，但是，这是测试动态输入的一种形式。

This is only an approach, I've never worked with cocoon. This is however, a form to test dynamic inputs.

这篇关于使用rspec和capybara测试茧动态添加的字段的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！