C ++循环标头包括 [英] C++ circular header includes

查看:96
本文介绍了C ++循环标头包括的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我知道之前也曾问过类似的问题,但是在进行研究之后,我仍然对循环标题包含问题。

I know that similar questions to this have been asked before but after doing my research I still have questions about circular header includes.

//FooA.h
#ifndef H_FOOA
#define H_FOOA

#include "foob.h"

class FooA{
   public:
      FooB *fooB;
};


//FooB.h
#ifndef H_FOOB
#define H_FOOB

class FooA;
class FooB{
   public:
      FooA *fooA;
};

现在,如果我有两个循环依赖项,这就是我看到Stackoverflow上的人绕过问题。我唯一的问题是在我的main.cpp中,必须先包含fooa.h,然后再包含foob.h

Now if I have two circular dependencies this is the way that I have seen people on stackoverflow get around the problem. My only problem with this is that in my main.cpp I must include fooa.h first and then foob.h

//main.cpp the right way
#include "fooa.h"
#include "foob.h"

//main.cpp that will surely get a compile error
#include "foob.h"
#include "fooa.h"

现在我的问题是是否有一种方法可以转发声明这些类,从而使我不必关心在main.cpp中包含头文件的顺序?

Now my question is "Is there a way to forward declare these classes in a way that will allow me to not care about the order in which I include the header files in my main.cpp?"

推荐答案


是否可以通过一种方式转发声明这些类,从而使我不必关心标题的顺序我的main.cpp中的文件?

Is there a way to forward declare these classes in a way that will allow me to not care about the order in which I include the header files in my main.cpp?

由于您仅在处理简单指针,因此在两种情况下都可以在此处使用前向声明:

since you are dealing with simple pointers only, you can use a forward declaration here in both cases:

FooA.h

#ifndef H_FOOA
#define H_FOOA

// #include "foob.h" << not needed!
class FooB;       // << substitute with a forward declaration of FooB

class FooA{
   public:
      FooB *fooB;
};
#endif

FooB.h

#ifndef H_FOOB
#define H_FOOB

class FooA;
class FooB{
   public:
      FooA *fooA;
};
#endif

这篇关于C ++循环标头包括的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆