ClearCase中的集成流与集成视图 [英] Integration stream vs integration view in ClearCase

问题描述

在明确的案例中，集成流和集成视图有什么区别？开发流和开发视图？

更具体地说，为什么 ）

根据约定，任何子流都称为开发流，因为它代表当前 开发工作 。

流是配置。

UCM视图是ClearCase视图，具有遵循Stream的配置自动为您完成的配置规范（而不是手动编写这些选择规则）。

集成视图是一个以集成流为参考的视图。

发展观是有发展观的t流作为参考。

此 流层次结构 是为了可视化您的合并工作流程（即：完成对分支' B '，您需要在哪里合并所说的工作？）

• 从子流中合并到父流：交付


• 从父流合并到直接子流：变基

In clear case terminology, what is the difference between integration stream and integration view? Development stream and development view?

More specifically, why "joining an UCM project" involves creating both integration and development views?

If I am a developer, not an integrator, should only one view be enough?

解决方案

Integration is a term used by convention to designate the first root stream of an UCM project.
Each UCM project has one root stream (and potentially many sub-streams).
The idea is that you will use your integration view as the destination view for deliver coming from sub-streams, effectively "integrated" the work done on said sub-streams on that integration view.

^{(Froml Stream hierarchy)}

Any sub-stream is called by convention a "development" Stream, in that it represents the "configuration" (ie what you need to work) for your current "development effort".

A Stream is a configuration.
An UCM view is a ClearCase view with a config spec done automatically for you following the configuration of the Stream (instead of writing those selection rules manually).

The integration view is a view with the Integration Stream as reference.
A Development view is a view with a development Stream as reference.

The main idea behind this hierarchy of streams is to visualize your merge workflow (ie: once you have finished a work on a branch 'B', where do you need to merge said work?)

• merge from a sub-stream to a parent stream: deliver
• merge from a parent stream to an immediate child stream: rebase

这篇关于ClearCase中的集成流与集成视图的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！