Websync：利弊？ [英] Websync: pros and cons?

问题描述

您使用 Websync （竞争框架）有什么经验？

What is your experience working with Websync (comet framework)? Have you considered any alternatives before using it?

到目前为止，我可以说

优点：

• 非常简单易用


• 不需要任何服务器配置

缺点：

• 价格昂贵（事实证明，这样做可以节省大量资金）带宽，所以不够）


• 缺少文档（WebSync3仍然很少，但是文档非常好而且很全面）


• JavaScript框架不够灵活（事实证明是足够灵活的，尽管花了一些时间来完成WebSync2所需的所有操作，但最终发现它成为WebSync3中的典型使用场景之一（身份验证等）

结论：
该框架非常简单，灵活，允许我们以作者从未使用过的方式使用它想到了;）

Conclusion: The framework is amazingly straightforward and flexible, and allowed us to use it in ways that authors never even thought of ;)

至于价格：事实证明，完全值得花这笔钱。

As for the price: it turned out to be totally worth the money. Plus the support is just beyond awesome.

推荐答案

我将它留给其他人发表对使用WebSync的想法，但我认为我至少会尝试解决缺点；）

I'll leave it to someone else to post their thoughts on their use of WebSync, but I figured I'd at least attempt to address the cons ;)

1）当然，相对于开源解决方案。但是，恕我直言，您要支付的前期费用是由于易用性和实施​​时间而容易弥补的：)。我认为您不会找到实现起来更快或更简单的彗星解决方案。相对于其他封闭源解决方案，我们非常便宜。其他一些彗星解决方案要获得20k +的许可费用，并且需要订阅支持。

1) Relative to open source solutions, sure. But, what you pay in up front costs, IMHO, you'll easily make up for due to ease of use and time of implementation :). I don't think you'll find a comet solution that's faster or simpler to implement. Relative to other closed-source solutions, we're pretty darn cheap; some other comet solutions run 20k+ for a license and require support subscriptions.

2）是的，我知道一个。示例和文档涵盖了基础知识，足以构成一个不错的应用程序，但对于更高级的场景等而言，它并没有涉及足够的细节。我们正在努力对其进行升级。

2) Yeah, I know that one. The examples and documentation cover the basics, and it's enough to pull together a decent app, but doesn't go into enough detail for more advanced scenarios, etc. We're working on upgrading it.

3）我很想知道您想在javascript框架中看到什么额外的灵活性；您是否在寻找特别的东西？在评论中添加注释！

3) I'd love to know what additional flexibility you'd like to see in the javascript framework; was there something in particular you were looking for? Drop a note in the comments!

这篇关于Websync：利弊？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！