是否对JavaScript引擎尾部调用(TCO)进行了优化? [英] Are any JavaScript engines tail call (TCO) optimized?
本文介绍了是否对JavaScript引擎尾部调用(TCO)进行了优化?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
我有一个用JavaScript实现的尾部递归路径查找算法,想知道是否有(全部?)浏览器可能会出现堆栈溢出异常.
I have a tail recursive pathfinding algorithm that I've implemented in JavaScript and would like to know if any (all?) browsers would possibly get stack overflow exceptions.
推荐答案
ECMAScript 4规范最初是要添加对TCO的支持,但已被删除:
The ECMAScript 4 specification was originally going to add support for TCO, but it was dropped:
据我所知,目前还没有广泛使用的JavaScript实现自动TCO.不过,这可能对您有用:
As far as I know, no widely-available implementations of JavaScript currently do automatic TCO. This may be of use to you, though:
基本上,使用累加器模式可以达到相同的效果.
Essentially, using the accumulator pattern accomplish the same effect.
这篇关于是否对JavaScript引擎尾部调用(TCO)进行了优化?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!
查看全文