如何简化嵌套地图调用? [英] How to simplify nested map calls?
本文介绍了如何简化嵌套地图调用?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
假设我有一些嵌套函子,例如List[Option[Int]]
,并且需要调用最内部的map
.
Suppose I have a few nested functors, e.g. List[Option[Int]]
and need to call the map
of the most inner one.
现在我正在使用嵌套的maps
:
Now I am using nested maps
:
scala> val opts: List[Option[Int]] = List(Some(0), Some(1))
opts: List[Option[Int]] = List(Some(0), Some(1))
scala> opts.map(o => o.map(_ + 1))
res0: List[Option[Int]] = List(Some(1), Some(2))
例如,如果我有3个嵌套级别,该怎么办?
嵌套maps
有什么简单的替代方法吗?
What if I have 3 nesting levels, for instance ?
Is there any simple alternative to nested maps
?
推荐答案
是的,使用scalaz.Functor可以实现:
Yes, this is possible with scalaz.Functor:
scala> import scalaz.Functor
import scalaz.Functor
scala> import scalaz.std.list._
import scalaz.std.list._
scala> import scalaz.std.option._
import scalaz.std.option._
scala> Functor[List].compose[Option].map(List(some(0), some(1)))(_ + 1)
res1: List[Option[Int]] = List(Some(1), Some(2))
但是,这比用嵌套的map
简单地调用map
更长.如果您经常映射嵌套结构,则可以创建辅助函数:
However, this is longer than to simply call map
with a nested map
. If you often map nested structures, you can create helper functions:
def map2[F[_], G[_], A, B](fg: F[G[A]])(f: A => B)
(implicit F0: Functor[F], G0: Functor[G]): F[G[B]] =
F0.map(fg)(g => G0.map(g)(f))
def map3[F[_], G[_], H[_], A, B](fg: F[G[H[A]]])(f: A => B)
(implicit F0: Functor[F], G0: Functor[G], H0: Functor[H]): F[G[H[B]]] =
F0.map(fg)(g => G0.map(g)(h => H0.map(h)(f)))
...
用法:
scala> map2(List(some(0), some(1)))(_ + 1)
res3: List[Option[Int]] = List(Some(1), Some(2))
scala> map3(List(some(some(0)), some(some(1))))(_ + 1)
res4: List[Option[Option[Int]]] = List(Some(Some(1)), Some(Some(2)))
这篇关于如何简化嵌套地图调用?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!
查看全文