为什么在.Net Core中没有要覆盖的Dispose方法? [英] Why is there no Dispose method to override in .Net Core?
问题描述
我正在尝试通过通用服务在我的GenericRep中处理DbContext.
I am trying to dispose of my DbContext in my GenericRep from my Generic Service.
My generic repo is implementing the pattern described here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/mvc/overview/older-versions/getting-started-with-ef-5-using-mvc-4/implementing-the-repository-and-unit-of-work-patterns-in-an-asp-net-mvc-application
我已经在回购中设置了第一部分:
I have set up the first part in my repo:
public class GenericRepository<T> : IGenericRepository<T>, IDisposable
where T: BaseEntity
{
protected readonly ApplicationDbContext _context;
protected DbSet<T> _dbSet;
.
.
.
private bool disposed = false;
protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (!this.disposed)
{
if (disposing)
{
_context.Dispose();
}
}
this.disposed = true;
}
public void Dispose()
{
Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
现在在文章中,他们在StudentController中具有以下内容:
Now in the article they have this in the StudentController:
protected override void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
studentRepository.Dispose();
base.Dispose(disposing);
}
他们没有实现IDisposable或任何东西的StudentController.我认为它们似乎能够将Dispose作为对Object的标准可重写方法来替代.
They don't have StudentController implementing IDisposable or anything. They just seem to be able to override Dispose as a standard overridable method on Object I guess.
所以我需要把它放在我的通用服务中.
So I need to put this in my Generic Service.
这是我的一般服务:
public class GenericService<T> : IGenericService<T>
where T : BaseEntity
{
private IGenericRepository<T> _genericRepo;
public GenericService(IGenericRepository<T> genericRepo)
{
_genericRepo = genericRepo;
}
.
.
.
public override void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
_genericRepo.Dispose();
base.Dispose(disposing);
}
所以我的代码上有两个红色的弯曲线.
So I have two red squigglies on my code.
1)找不到合适的方法来替代GenericService.
1) No suitable method found to override for GenericService.
这是Full Framework中的标准可重写对象,而不是.Net Core?
Is this a standard overridable object in Full Framework but not .Net Core?
2)对象不包含基于base.Dispose调用的Dispose的定义.
2) Object does not contain a definition for Dispose on base.Dispose call.
在.Net Core中,这样做是否有所不同?
Is this just done differently somehow in .Net Core?
更新1:
感谢Nkosi在下面给出的答案(答案1).
Thanks Nkosi for your answer below (Answer 1).
所以现在我从控制器中调用serviceRepo进行处理,如下所示:
So now I am calling the serviceRepo dispose from my controller like this:
[Route("api/[controller]")]
public class CasesController : Controller, IDisposable
{
private readonly IGenericService<Case> _caseGenericService;
public CasesController(IGenericService<Case> caseGenericService)
{
_caseGenericService = caseGenericService;
}
.
.
.
private bool disposed = false;
protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (!this.disposed)
{
if (disposing)
{
_caseGenericService.Dispose();
base.Dispose();
}
}
this.disposed = true;
}
public void Dispose()
{
Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
这是一种工作,有一些处理方法.但随后它似乎开始挂起.
It kind of works, for a few disposes. But then it seems to start hanging.
推荐答案
通用服务将必须像通用存储库中那样定义/实现一次性的.当前类正在定义它,因此没有要重写或要调用的东西.
The generic service will have to define/implement disposable just like in the generic repository. There is nothing to override or base to call as the current class is defining it.
public class GenericService<T> : IGenericService<T>, IDisposable
where T : BaseEntity
{
private IGenericRepository<T> _genericRepo;
public GenericService(IGenericRepository<T> genericRepo)
{
_genericRepo = genericRepo;
}
.
.
.
private bool disposed = false;
// Protected implementation of Dispose pattern.
protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (disposed)
return;
if (disposing) {
_genericRepo.Dispose();
// Free any other managed objects here.
//
}
// Free any unmanaged objects here.
//
disposed = true;
}
public void Dispose()
{
Dispose(true);
GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
}
}
参考文献实现处置方法
这篇关于为什么在.Net Core中没有要覆盖的Dispose方法?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!