C ++函数定义和变量声明不匹配? [英] C++ function definition and variable declaration mismatch?

查看:70
本文介绍了C ++函数定义和变量声明不匹配?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

考虑以下非常简单的代码:

Consider this very simple code:

#include <memory>

class Foo
{
public:
    Foo() {};
};

class Bar
{
public:
    Bar( const std::shared_ptr<Foo>& foo ) {}
}; 

int main()
{
    Foo* foo = new Foo;
    Bar bar( std::shared_ptr<Foo>( foo ) );
    return 0;
}

为什么Visual Studio报告

Why does Visual Studio reports

warning C4930: 'Bar bar(std::shared_ptr<Foo>)': prototyped function not called (was a variable definition intended?)

并且没有创建 bar 对象...此行 Bar bar(std :: shared_ptr< Foo>(foo)); 怎么解释为函数定义?

and there is no bar object created...how can this line Bar bar( std::shared_ptr<Foo>( foo ) ); be interpreted as a function definition?

我检查了做括号类型名称之后是否与new有所不同?以及

I checked Do the parentheses after the type name make a difference with new? and also C++: warning: C4930: prototyped function not called (was a variable definition intended?), but I feel my problem is different here as I did not use the syntax Foo() nor Bar().

请注意,它可以成功编译:

Note that it successfully compiles:

Foo* foo = new Foo;
std::shared_ptr<Foo> fooPtr( foo );
Bar bar( fooPtr );

推荐答案

此问题与 C ++最令人讨厌的解析有关.声明:

Bar bar( std::shared_ptr<Foo>( foo ) );

声明一个名为 bar 的函数,该函数返回 Bar 并接受名为 std :: shared_ptr< Foo>类型的名为 foo 的参数..

declares a function called bar that returns Bar and takes an argument called foo of type std::shared_ptr<Foo>.

最里面的括号无效.就像您将编写以下内容一样:

The innermost parenthesis have no effect. It is as if you would have written the following:

Bar bar( std::shared_ptr<Foo> foo);


假设使用C ++ 11(因为您已经在使用 std :: shared_ptr ),则可以使用括号语法代替括号:

Bar bar(std::shared_ptr<Foo>{foo});

这实际上将构造一个类型为 Bar 的对象 bar ,因为上面的语句由于括号不能被解释为声明.

This would actually construct an object bar of type Bar, since the statement above can't be interpreted as a declaration because of the braces.

这篇关于C ++函数定义和变量声明不匹配?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆