C#用.Equals()比较两个double [英] C# Compare two double with .Equals()
本文介绍了C#用.Equals()比较两个double的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
我使用ReShaper,当我将两个double值与==进行比较时,建议我使用数学运算.ABS方法具有公差.请参阅: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/resharper/2016.2/CompareOfFloatsByEqualityOperator.html
I use ReShaper and when I compare two double values with ==, it suggests that I should use the Math. ABS method with a tolerance. See: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/resharper/2016.2/CompareOfFloatsByEqualityOperator.html
这个例子
double d = 0.0;
double d2 = 0.0;
if (d == d2)
{
/* some code */
}
然后转换为
double d = 0.0;
double d2 = 0.0;
if (Math.Abs(d - d2) < TOLERANCE)
{
/* some code */
}
但是,我认为对于开发人员而言,考虑正确的容忍度确实很复杂.所以我认为可以在Double.Equals()方法中实现.
But I think it's really complicated for a developer to think about the right tolerance. So I thought this may be implemented in the Double.Equals() method.
但是这种方法是这样实现的
But this method is implemented like so
public override bool Equals(Object obj) {
if (!(obj is Double)) {
return false;
}
double temp = ((Double)obj).m_value;
// This code below is written this way for performance reasons i.e the != and == check is intentional.
if (temp == m_value) {
return true;
}
return IsNaN(temp) && IsNaN(m_value);
}
public bool Equals(Double obj)
{
if (obj == m_value) {
return true;
}
return IsNaN(obj) && IsNaN(m_value);
}
为什么?比较双值的正确方法是什么?
推荐答案
您可以创建扩展方法
public static class DoubleExtension
{
public static bool AlmostEqualTo(this double value1, double value2)
{
return Math.Abs(value1 - value2) < 0.0000001;
}
}
并像这样使用它
doubleValue.AlmostEqualTo(doubleValue2)
这篇关于C#用.Equals()比较两个double的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!
查看全文