小程序为什么会有这么低的采用水平? [英] Why do applets have such a low adoption level?

查看:88
本文介绍了小程序为什么会有这么低的采用水平?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

为什么小程序有如此低的通过水平,例如针对闪存相比?
是不是因为他们是技术的缺点,或者是它只是普及的问题?

Why do applets have such a low adoption level, compared for example against Flash? Is it because they are technological disadvantages, or is it just an issue of popularity?

推荐答案

有一点大家似乎忘记了:原来的Flash有一个非常设计师导向的工作流,所以很多图形设计师在船上跳下,做很酷的东西,这互联网用户找到乐趣,所以他们会下载Flash和社区长大。

One point everyone seems to be forgetting: Originally Flash had a very designer oriented work-flow, so many graphical designers jumped on board and made cool looking stuff, which Internet-users found fun, so they would download Flash, and the community grew.

在另一方面Java小程序在程序员和企业进行了有针对性的,那就是罚款,但枯燥的普通用户。并在顶时,该脚本小子的(包括我自己)提出,资源泄漏和/或冻结的浏览器,甚至其他更多的技术小子用小程序的力量创造陷阱,Applet和有害的网站,因此多数互联网用户不会使小程序。

Java Applets on the other hand were targeted at programmers and enterprises, and that was fine, but boring to the average user. And on-top of that the script kiddies of the time (myself included) made Applets that leaked resources and/or froze the browser, and even other more skilled kiddies used the powers of Applets to create traps, and harmful websites, so most Internet users wouldn't enable Applets.

所以最终它可能是目标开发引起的问题(图形设计师与程序员)每个平台。

So in the end it was probably the target developers (graphical designers vs. programmers) of each platform that caused the issues.

这篇关于小程序为什么会有这么低的采用水平?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆