如何计算逻辑回归准确度 [英] How to calculate logistic regression accuracy

问题描述

我是python机器学习和编码的完全入门者，我受过从零开始进行逻辑回归编码的任务，以了解幕后发生的事情.到目前为止，我已经对假设函数，成本函数和梯度下降进行了编码，然后对逻辑回归进行了编码.但是，在为打印精度进行编码时，我得到的输出很低(0.69)，它不会随着迭代次数的增加或学习率的改变而变化.我的问题是，下面的我的准确性代码是否有问题?任何指向正确方向的帮助将不胜感激

I am a complete beginner in machine learning and coding in python, and I have been tasked with coding logistic regression from scratch to understand what happens under the hood. So far I have coded for the hypothesis function, cost function and gradient descent, and then coded for the logistic regression. However on coding for printing the accuracy I get a low output (0.69) which doesnt change with increasing iterations or changing the learning rate. My question is, is there a problem with my accuracy code below? Any help pointing to the right direction would be appreciated

X = data[['radius_mean', 'texture_mean', 'perimeter_mean',
   'area_mean', 'smoothness_mean', 'compactness_mean', 'concavity_mean',
   'concave points_mean', 'symmetry_mean', 'fractal_dimension_mean',
   'radius_se', 'texture_se', 'perimeter_se', 'area_se', 'smoothness_se',
   'compactness_se', 'concavity_se', 'concave points_se', 'symmetry_se',
   'fractal_dimension_se', 'radius_worst', 'texture_worst',
   'perimeter_worst', 'area_worst', 'smoothness_worst',
   'compactness_worst', 'concavity_worst', 'concave points_worst',
   'symmetry_worst', 'fractal_dimension_worst']]
X = np.array(X)
X = min_max_scaler.fit_transform(X)
Y = data["diagnosis"].map({'M':1,'B':0})
Y = np.array(Y)

X_train,X_test,Y_train,Y_test = train_test_split(X,Y,test_size=0.25)

X = data["diagnosis"].map(lambda x: float(x))

def Sigmoid(z):
    if z < 0:
        return 1 - 1/(1 + math.exp(z))
    else:
        return 1/(1 + math.exp(-z))

def Hypothesis(theta, x):
    z = 0
    for i in range(len(theta)):
        z += x[i]*theta[i]
    return Sigmoid(z)

def Cost_Function(X,Y,theta,m):
    sumOfErrors = 0
    for i in range(m):
        xi = X[i]
        hi = Hypothesis(theta,xi)
        error = Y[i] * math.log(hi if  hi >0 else 1)
        if Y[i] == 1:
            error = Y[i] * math.log(hi if  hi >0 else 1)
        elif Y[i] == 0:
            error = (1-Y[i]) * math.log(1-hi  if  1-hi >0 else 1)
        sumOfErrors += error

    constant = -1/m
    J = constant * sumOfErrors
    #print ('cost is: ', J ) 
    return J

def Cost_Function_Derivative(X,Y,theta,j,m,alpha):
    sumErrors = 0
    for i in range(m):
        xi = X[i]
        xij = xi[j]
        hi = Hypothesis(theta,X[i])
        error = (hi - Y[i])*xij
        sumErrors += error
    m = len(Y)
    constant = float(alpha)/float(m)
    J = constant * sumErrors
    return J

def Gradient_Descent(X,Y,theta,m,alpha):
    new_theta = []
    constant = alpha/m
    for j in range(len(theta)):
        CFDerivative = Cost_Function_Derivative(X,Y,theta,j,m,alpha)
        new_theta_value = theta[j] - CFDerivative
        new_theta.append(new_theta_value)
    return new_theta


def Accuracy(theta):
    correct = 0
    length = len(X_test, Hypothesis(X,theta))
    for i in range(length):
        prediction = round(Hypothesis(X[i],theta))
        answer = Y[i]
    if prediction == answer.all():
            correct += 1
    my_accuracy = (correct / length)*100
    print ('LR Accuracy %: ', my_accuracy)



def Logistic_Regression(X,Y,alpha,theta,num_iters):
    theta = np.zeros(X.shape[1])
    m = len(Y)
    for x in range(num_iters):
        new_theta = Gradient_Descent(X,Y,theta,m,alpha)
        theta = new_theta
        if x % 100 == 0:
            Cost_Function(X,Y,theta,m)
            print ('theta: ', theta)    
            print ('cost: ', Cost_Function(X,Y,theta,m))
    Accuracy(theta)

initial_theta = [0,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1]  
alpha = 0.0001
iterations = 1000
Logistic_Regression(X,Y,alpha,initial_theta,iterations)

这使用的是威斯康星州乳腺癌数据集中的数据( https://www.kaggle.com/uciml/breast-cancer-wisconsin-data )中，我权衡了30个特征-尽管将特征更改为已知相关的特征也不会改变我的准确性.

This is using data from the wisconsin breast cancer dataset (https://www.kaggle.com/uciml/breast-cancer-wisconsin-data) where I am weighing in 30 features - although changing the features to ones which are known to correlate also doesn't change my accuracy.

推荐答案

我不确定您如何得出 alpha 的 0.0001 值，但是我认为太低了将您的代码与癌症数据结合使用表明，每次迭代的成本都在降低-只是冰山一角.

I'm not sure how you arrived at a value of 0.0001 for alpha, but I think it's too low. Using your code with the cancer data shows that cost is decreasing with each iteration -- it's just going glacially.

当我将其提高到0.5时，我仍然获得了降低的成本，但是在一个更合理的水平上.经过1000次迭代后，它会报告:

When I raise this to 0.5, I still get a decreasing costs, but at a more reasonable level. After 1000 iterations it reports:

cost:  0.23668000993020666

修复了 Accuracy 函数后，我在数据测试段上获得了92％的数据.

And after fixing the Accuracy function I'm getting 92% on the test segment of the data.

您已经安装了Numpy，如 X = np.array(X)所示.您应该真正考虑将其用于操作.这样的工作将数量级更快.这是向量化版本，可立即提供结果，而无需等待:

You have Numpy installed, as shown by X = np.array(X). You should really consider using it for your operations. It will be orders of magnitude faster for jobs like this. Here is a vectorized version that gives results instantly rather than waiting:

import math
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.preprocessing import MinMaxScaler
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split

df = pd.read_csv("cancerdata.csv")
X = df.values[:,2:-1].astype('float64')
X = (X - np.mean(X, axis =0)) /  np.std(X, axis = 0)

## Add a bias column to the data
X = np.hstack([np.ones((X.shape[0], 1)),X])
X = MinMaxScaler().fit_transform(X)
Y = df["diagnosis"].map({'M':1,'B':0})
Y = np.array(Y)
X_train,X_test,Y_train,Y_test = train_test_split(X,Y,test_size=0.25)


def Sigmoid(z):
    return 1/(1 + np.exp(-z))

def Hypothesis(theta, x):   
    return Sigmoid(x @ theta) 

def Cost_Function(X,Y,theta,m):
    hi = Hypothesis(theta, X)
    _y = Y.reshape(-1, 1)
    J = 1/float(m) * np.sum(-_y * np.log(hi) - (1-_y) * np.log(1-hi))
    return J

def Cost_Function_Derivative(X,Y,theta,m,alpha):
    hi = Hypothesis(theta,X)
    _y = Y.reshape(-1, 1)
    J = alpha/float(m) * X.T @ (hi - _y)
    return J

def Gradient_Descent(X,Y,theta,m,alpha):
    new_theta = theta - Cost_Function_Derivative(X,Y,theta,m,alpha)
    return new_theta

def Accuracy(theta):
    correct = 0
    length = len(X_test)
    prediction = (Hypothesis(theta, X_test) > 0.5)
    _y = Y_test.reshape(-1, 1)
    correct = prediction == _y
    my_accuracy = (np.sum(correct) / length)*100
    print ('LR Accuracy %: ', my_accuracy)

def Logistic_Regression(X,Y,alpha,theta,num_iters):
    m = len(Y)
    for x in range(num_iters):
        new_theta = Gradient_Descent(X,Y,theta,m,alpha)
        theta = new_theta
        if x % 100 == 0:
            #print ('theta: ', theta)    
            print ('cost: ', Cost_Function(X,Y,theta,m))
    Accuracy(theta)

ep = .012

initial_theta = np.random.rand(X_train.shape[1],1) * 2 * ep - ep
alpha = 0.5
iterations = 2000
Logistic_Regression(X_train,Y_train,alpha,initial_theta,iterations)

我想我可能有不同版本的scikit，因为我更改了 MinMaxScaler 行以使其起作用.结果是，我可以眨眼间进行1万次迭代，将模型应用于测试集的结果的准确性约为97％.

I think I might have a different versions of scikit, because I had change the MinMaxScaler line to make it work. The result is that I can 10K iterations in the blink of an eye and the results of the applying the model to the test set is about 97% accuracy.

这篇关于如何计算逻辑回归准确度的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！