如何重试 Promise 解决方案 N 次,两次尝试之间有延迟? [英] How to retry a Promise resolution N times, with a delay between the attempts?
问题描述
我想要一些 JavaScript 代码将 3 个东西作为参数:
I want some JavaScript code to take 3 things as parameters:
- 返回 Promise 的函数.
- 最大尝试次数.
- 每次尝试之间的延迟.
我最终做的是使用 for
循环.我不想使用递归函数:这样,即使有 50 次尝试,调用堆栈也不会长 50 行.
What I ended up doing is using a for
loop. I did not want to use a recursive function : this way, even if there are 50 attempts the call stack isn't 50 lines longer.
这是代码的打字稿版本:
/**
* @async
* @function tryNTimes<T> Tries to resolve a {@link Promise<T>} N times, with a delay between each attempt.
* @param {Object} options Options for the attempts.
* @param {() => Promise<T>} options.toTry The {@link Promise<T>} to try to resolve.
* @param {number} [options.times=5] The maximum number of attempts (must be greater than 0).
* @param {number} [options.interval=1] The interval of time between each attempt in seconds.
* @returns {Promise<T>} The resolution of the {@link Promise<T>}.
*/
export async function tryNTimes<T>(
{
toTry,
times = 5,
interval = 1,
}:
{
toTry: () => Promise<T>,
times?: number,
interval?: number,
}
): Promise<T> {
if (times < 1) throw new Error(`Bad argument: 'times' must be greater than 0, but ${times} was received.`);
let attemptCount: number;
for (attemptCount = 1; attemptCount <= times; attemptCount++) {
let error: boolean = false;
const result = await toTry().catch((reason) => {
error = true;
return reason;
});
if (error) {
if (attemptCount < times) await delay(interval);
else return Promise.reject(result);
}
else return result;
}
}
上面使用的delay
函数是一个promisified timeout:
The delay
function used above is a promisified timeout:
/**
* @function delay Delays the execution of an action.
* @param {number} time The time to wait in seconds.
* @returns {Promise<void>}
*/
export function delay(time: number): Promise<void> {
return new Promise<void>((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, time * 1000));
}
澄清:上面的代码有效,我只是想知道这是否是一种好"的做法,如果不是,我该如何改进.
To clarify: the code above works, I'm only wondering if this is a "good" way of doing it, and if not, how I could improve it.
有什么建议吗?预先感谢您的帮助.
Any suggestion? Thanks in advance for your help.
推荐答案
我不想使用递归函数:这样,即使有 50 次尝试,调用堆栈也不会长 50 行.
I did not want to use a recursive function: this way, even if there are 50 attempts the call stack isn't 50 lines longer.
这不是一个好借口.调用堆栈不会因异步调用而溢出,当递归解决方案比迭代解决方案更直观时,您可能应该采用它.
That's not a good excuse. The call stack doesn't overflow from asynchronous calls, and when a recursive solution is more intuitive than an iterative one you should probably go for it.
我最终做的是使用 for
循环.这是一种好"的做法吗?如果不是,我该如何改进?
What I ended up doing is using a
for
loop. Is this a "good" way of doing it, and if not, how I could improve it?
for
循环很好.虽然它从 1
开始有点奇怪,但基于 0 的循环更加惯用.
The for
loop is fine. It's a bit weird that it starts at 1
though, 0-based loops are much more idiomatic.
然而,你奇怪的错误处理是不好的.该布尔 error
标志不应该出现在您的代码中.使用 .catch()
很好,但 try
/catch
也能正常工作,应该是首选.
What is not fine however is your weird error handling. That boolean error
flag should have no place in your code. Using .catch()
is fine, but try
/catch
would work just as well and should be preferred.
export async function tryNTimes<T>({ toTry, times = 5, interval = 1}) {
if (times < 1) throw new Error(`Bad argument: 'times' must be greater than 0, but ${times} was received.`);
let attemptCount = 0
while (true) {
try {
const result = await toTry();
return result;
} catch(error) {
if (++attemptCount >= times) throw error;
}
await delay(interval)
}
}
这篇关于如何重试 Promise 解决方案 N 次,两次尝试之间有延迟?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!