`expect` 测试中的 Rspec `eq` 与 `eql` [英] Rspec `eq` vs `eql` in `expect` tests
本文介绍了`expect` 测试中的 Rspec `eq` 与 `eql`的处理方法，对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值，需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧！
问题描述
在 rspec 测试中使用 eq 和 eql 有什么区别?是否有区别:
What is the difference between using eq and eql in rspec tests? Is there a difference between:
it "adds the correct information to entries" do
# book = AddressBook.new # => Replaced by line 4
book.add_entry('Ada Lovelace', '010.012.1815', 'augusta.king@lovelace.com')
new_entry = book.entries[0]
expect(new_entry.name).to eq('Ada Lovelace')
expect(new_entry.phone_number).to eq('010.012.1815')
expect(new_entry.email).to eq('augusta.king@lovelace.com')
end
和:
it "adds the correct information to entries" do
# book = AddressBook.new # => Replaced by line 4
book.add_entry('Ada Lovelace', '010.012.1815', 'augusta.king@lovelace.com')
new_entry = book.entries[0]
expect(new_entry.name).to eql('Ada Lovelace')
expect(new_entry.phone_number).to eql('010.012.1815')
expect(new_entry.email).to eql('augusta.king@lovelace.com')
end
推荐答案
根据比较中使用的相等类型，此处存在细微差别.
There are subtle differences here, based on the type of equality being used in the comparison.
来自 Rpsec 文档:
From the Rpsec docs:
Ruby exposes several different methods for handling equality:
a.equal?(b) # object identity - a and b refer to the same object
a.eql?(b) # object equivalence - a and b have the same value
a == b # object equivalence - a and b have the same value with type conversions]
eq 使用 == 运算符进行比较，eql 忽略类型转换.
eq uses the == operator for comparison, and eql ignores type conversions.
这篇关于`expect` 测试中的 Rspec `eq` 与 `eql`的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
查看全文
