为什么在 Rails 中不推荐使用 auto_link? [英] Why was auto_link deprecated in Rails?

问题描述

我意识到它已被拉入一个单独的 gem 中，但原因是什么?这只是简化 Rails 的问题，还是我应该厌倦 auto_link 的原因?

(gem 说它是为了弥合人们迁移的差距"，这表明如果我将 rails_autolink 引入一个新项目，我一定是做错了什么，不是吗?)

谢谢，

解决方案

从移除 auto_link 的提交，Aaron Patterson (tenderlove) 在评论中解释:

<块引用>

不幸的是，这种方法极难正确保护.确保这种方法是防弹的，需要比 Rails 更快的发布周期.这就是为什么我们将其移至 gem 的原因.如果您需要该功能，请使用 gem！:-)

https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/81cfbf4146d3c5a58054b64112b8ce196f2fc061">https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/81cfbf4146d3c5a58054b641961bc5a581961bcfb2f88054b

每个安全修复只需要更新一个 gem，而不是 Rails 的 6 个.

I realize it's been pulled into a separate gem, but what's the reason? Is this just a matter of streamlining Rails, or is there some reason I should be weary of auto_link?

(The gem says it's meant to 'bridge the gap for people migrating', which suggests to me that if I'm introducing rails_autolink into a new project, I must be doing something wrong, no?)

thanks,

解决方案

From the commit where auto_link was removed, Aaron Patterson (tenderlove) explains in the comments:

Unfortunately this method is extremely difficult to secure correctly. Ensuring this method is bullet-proof takes a faster release cycle than we have for rails. That's why we moved it to a gem. Please use the gem if you need the functionality! :-)

https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/81cfbf4146d3c5a58054b64112b8ce196f2fc061

Each security fix only requires updating one gem, instead of the 6 for rails.

这篇关于为什么在 Rails 中不推荐使用 auto_link?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！