为什么 Arc 和 Mutex 允许我更改不可变变量的值? [英] Why do Arc and Mutex allow me to change the value of an immutable variable?

查看:47
本文介绍了为什么 Arc 和 Mutex 允许我更改不可变变量的值?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

举个例子:

fn main() {让 dato = std::sync::Arc::new(std::sync::Mutex::new(1u8));对于 _ 在 0..3 {让值 = dato.clone();std::thread::spawn(移动||{让 v = value.lock().unwrap();*v += 1;//<- 错误});}std::thread::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_secs(1u64));println!("{:?}", 数据);}

<块引用>

不能借用不可变的局部变量 v 作为可变的

我知道更改为 mut 是有效的:

std::thread::spawn(move || {让 mut v = value.lock().unwrap();*v += 1;});

但是为什么这样做:

let value = dato.clone();std::thread::spawn(移动||{*value.lock().unwrap() += 1;});

游乐场

解决方案

value.lock().unwrap() 返回 MutexGuard,它有一个 DerefMut 实现:

impl<'mutex, T: ?Sized>DerefMut for MutexGuard<'mutex, T>{fn deref_mut(&mut self) ->&mut T { ... }}

DerefMut::deref_mut(x) 等价于 &mut *x;自然,DerefMut 也用于指针下的赋值,就像你的情况一样.

因此,要使 *v += 1 起作用,v 应该是 mut 变量 - 否则 DerefMut::deref_mut 被调用.

*value.lock().unwrap() += 1 有效,因为现在 value.lock().unwrap() 是一个没有显式绑定的临时变量,因此 Rust 可以自由地自动分配其可变性.

Mutex 内部包含一个 UnsafeCell 的事实与 DerefMut 的这个特定的事情没有直接关系;然而,这确实意味着 Mutex 提供了一种称为内部可变性的东西,即它允许人们通过共享引用来改变其内容.您可以在书中阅读更多相关内容.

Take this example:

fn main() {
    let dato = std::sync::Arc::new(std::sync::Mutex::new(1u8));

    for _ in 0..3 {
        let value = dato.clone();

        std::thread::spawn(move || {
            let v = value.lock().unwrap();
            *v += 1; // <- Error
        });
    }

    std::thread::sleep(std::time::Duration::from_secs(1u64));

    println!("{:?}", dato);
}

cannot borrow immutable local variable v as mutable

I know that changing to mut works:

std::thread::spawn(move || {
    let mut v = value.lock().unwrap();
    *v += 1;
});

but why does this work:

let value = dato.clone();

std::thread::spawn(move || {
    *value.lock().unwrap() += 1;    
});

playground

解决方案

value.lock().unwrap() returns a value of type MutexGuard, which has a DerefMut implementation:

impl<'mutex, T: ?Sized> DerefMut for MutexGuard<'mutex, T> {
    fn deref_mut(&mut self) -> &mut T { ... }
}

DerefMut::deref_mut(x) is equivalent to &mut *x; naturally, DerefMut is also used for assignments under the pointer, like in your case.

Therefore, for *v += 1 to work, v should be a mut variable - otherwise it would be impossible for DerefMut::deref_mut to be invoked at all.

*value.lock().unwrap() += 1 works because now value.lock().unwrap() is a temporary variable without an explicit binding, so Rust is free to assign its mutability automatically.

The fact that Mutex contains an UnsafeCell inside is not related to this particular thing about DerefMut directly; however, it does mean that Mutex provides something called internal mutability, i.e. it allows one to mutate its contents through a shared reference. You can read more on it in the book.

这篇关于为什么 Arc 和 Mutex 允许我更改不可变变量的值?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆