带有 ADT 和 Aux 模式的类型安全 [英] Type-safety with ADT and Aux pattern
本文介绍了带有 ADT 和 Aux 模式的类型安全的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!
问题描述
我正在设计带有 ADT 和 Aux-pattern 的类型安全代码并且无法摆脱一些 asInstanceOf
.例子如下:
I'm designing type-safe code with ADT and Aux-pattern and cannot get rid of some asInstanceOf
. Here is the example:
sealed trait Source
case object FileSystem extends Source
case object Network extends Source
sealed trait Data {
type S <: Source
}
object Data {
type Aux[T <: Source] = Data { type S = T }
}
case class RegularFile(path: String) extends Data { type S = FileSystem.type }
case class Directory(path: String) extends Data { type S = FileSystem.type }
case class UnixDevice(path: String) extends Data { type S = FileSystem.type }
case class Remote(ip: String) extends Data { type S = Network.type }
//Lots of asInstanceOf
def availableData[S <: Source](src: Source): List[Data.Aux[S]] = {
src match {
case FileSystem => List(
RegularFile("/tmp/test").asInstanceOf[Data.Aux[S]],
Directory("/home/somename").asInstanceOf[Data.Aux[S]],
UnixDevice("/dev/null").asInstanceOf[Data.Aux[S]],
)
case Network => List(
Remote("192.168.0.1").asInstanceOf[Data.Aux[S]]
)
}
}
在这种情况下,很明显 asInstanceOf
是正确的,但有没有办法得到它?
In this case it is pretty obvious that asInstanceOf
is correct, but is there a way to get rig of it?
我正在考虑 S <: Source: ClassTag
,但它在这里似乎没有用.也许其他反射技巧?
I was considering S <: Source: ClassTag
, but it doesn't seem to be useful here. Maybe other reflection trick?
推荐答案
请看说明为什么签名
def availableData[S <: Source](src: S): List[Data.Aux[S]] = {
src match {
case FileSystem => List(
RegularFile("/tmp/test"),
Directory("/home/somename"),
UnixDevice("/dev/null"),
)
case Network => List(
Remote("192.168.0.1")
)
}
}
不起作用,有几种方法可以解决它:
doesn't work and several approachs how to fix it:
如果将 A 的泛型子类型声明为返回参数,为什么我不能返回 A 的具体子类型?
例如尝试一个类型类
trait AvailableData[S <: Source] {
def availableData(src: S): List[Data.Aux[S]]
}
object AvailableData {
implicit val fileSystem: AvailableData[FileSystem.type] = _ =>
List[Data.Aux[FileSystem.type]](
RegularFile("/tmp/test"),
Directory("/home/somename"),
UnixDevice("/dev/null"),
)
implicit val network: AvailableData[Network.type] = _ =>
List[Data.Aux[Network.type]](
Remote("192.168.0.1")
)
}
def availableData[S <: Source](src: S)(implicit
ad: AvailableData[S]
): List[Data.Aux[S]] = ad.availableData(src)
这篇关于带有 ADT 和 Aux 模式的类型安全的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!
查看全文