SVN?VSS?为什么一个比另一个好? [英] SVN? VSS? Why is one better than the other?
问题描述
我倾向于觉得这里的大多数人认为 SVN 是镀金的好东西，而 VSS 是有史以来设计的最糟糕的程序(至少就版本控制而言).
I tend to get the feeling that most folks here think SVN is gold-plated goodness, whereas VSS is the worst program ever devised (at least as Version Control is concerned).
说了，为什么?我使用过一些 CVS，我目前的工作使用 VSS，从团队的角度来看，我真的看不出有多大区别.我所看到的大多数差异都是表面上的.当然，我也没有尝试进行任何分支/合并，但是作为一名进来的编码员，检查文件，处理这些文件并在一天结束时检查它们，为什么我想要 1 超过其他?
That said, why? I've used some CVS, and my current job uses VSS, and from a grunt on the team's perspective, I can't really tell that much difference. Most of the differences I've seen are cosmetic. Granted, I've not tried to do any branching/merging in either, but as a coder who comes in, checks out files, works on those files and checks them in at the end of the day, why would I want 1 over the other?
推荐答案
Visual SourceSafe?打印出所有代码，通过碎纸机运行，然后将其点燃会更安全." - (归因于身份不明的 Microsoft 员工).
SourceSafe 有很多问题，而且没有任何补救功能.有几种免费可用的跨平台替代方案，它们更安全、更快、更强大.Subversion 可能是其中使用最广泛的.有些人更喜欢分布式版本控制系统，例如 Git、Mercurial 或 Bazaar.
SourceSafe has many problems and no redeeming features. There are several freely available, cross-platform alternatives that are safer, faster and more powerful. Subversion is probably the most widely used of these. Some people prefer distributed version control systems such as Git, Mercurial or Bazaar.
一些关于为什么 VSS 如此糟糕的阅读:
Some reading about why VSS is so bad:
这篇关于SVN?VSS?为什么一个比另一个好?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
