为什么人们说“不要使用 place()"? [英] Why do people say "Don't use place()"?

问题描述

我一直在为自己开发一个笔记程序，它运行良好，但是我在使用 .pack() 将所有小部件放置在我想要的位置时遇到了很多问题或 .grid() 选项.

I have been working on a note taking program for myself and it is going well however I have had a lot of problems with getting all my widgets placed where I want them using the .pack() or .grid() options.

环顾四周后，我发现我可以改用 .place() 选项.在我决定使用 .place() 之前，我发现无数论坛帖子说不要使用 .place()！".

After looking around I found that I could use the .place() option instead. Before I decided to use .place() I found countless forum post saying "don't use .place()!".

我对其他选项束手无策，所以我决定尝试一下 .place().结果证明 .place() 正是我解决布局问题所需要的，我只是不明白为什么每个人都如此讨厌 .place().

I was at a stand still with my other options so I decided to give .place() a try. It turns out .place() is exactly what I needed to fix my layout issues and I just don't understand why everyone is hating on .place() so much.

.place() 是否存在固有的错误?或者人们只是出于一些实际原因而不是易用性而更喜欢使用 .pack() 和 .grid() ?

Is there something inherently wrong with .place()? Or do people just prefer to use .pack() and .grid() for some practical reason other than ease of use?

推荐答案

.place 没有什么问题，尽管使用了 grid 和 pack> 为您提供更多可维护的代码.例如，如果您想添加一个功能，place 将要求您更改绝对位置的负载以适应按钮.

There's nothing really wrong with .place, although using grid and pack give you more maintainable code. If you want to add a feature then place would require you to alter loads of absolute placements to fit a button in, for example.

如果你需要使用它然后使用它，它没有真正的问题，它只是不是许多问题的最易于维护的解决方案.正如你所说，这是一个偏好和易用性的问题.

If you need to use it then use it, there's no real problem with it, it just isn't the most maintainable solution to many problems. As you say, it's a matter of preference and ease of use.

您可以在此处阅读一个很好的答案.

there's an excellent answer you can read about it here.

这篇关于为什么人们说“不要使用 place()"?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！