你觉得Postgres的和Firebird数据库？ [英] What do you think of Postgres and Firebird Databases?

问题描述

我想postgre和Firebird databasses之间做出选择。该数据库将被安装asp.net 3.5的Windows 2003 Server上。我不想使用，因为价格问题，SQL Server和我不想要的MySQL我与它和.NET连接器和成员资格提供一个坏的经验。

I am trying to choose between postgre and firebird databasses. The database will be installed on a windows 2003 server with asp.net 3.5. i don't want to use sql server because of price issues and I don't want MySQL I had a bad experience with it and the .net connector and the membership provider.

推荐答案

我一直用的Postgres pssed IM $ P $;它传统上有一个更完整的功能集（在ACID合规，先进的查询的支持等方面）比MySQL，它具有坚实的Windows ODBC驱动程序及其文档一丝不苟地指出了它从SQL标准不符的任何区域。 （所有数据库，似乎偏离在某一方面或其他，但Postgres的是唯一一个我见过确保当你这样做，你知道的。）我没有试过你描述的使用场景，但我'已经有在Linux上运行它，并从两个ODBC的Windows和Linux客户端访问它没有问题。

I've always been impressed with Postgres; it's traditionally had a more complete feature set (in terms of ACID compliance, support for advanced queries, etc.) than MySQL, it has solid Windows ODBC drivers, and its documentation scrupulously points out any areas in which it deviates from the SQL standard. (All databases, it seems, deviate in one respect or another, but Postgres is the only one I've seen that makes sure you know when you're doing so.) I haven't tried the usage scenario you describe, but I've had no problems running it on Linux and accessing it from both Windows ODBC and Linux clients.

我没有与任何火鸟经验;抱歉。

I don't have any experience with Firebird; sorry.

这篇关于你觉得Postgres的和Firebird数据库？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！