在 NDB 中存储关系值的有效方法 [英] Efficient way to store relation values in NDB

查看:25
本文介绍了在 NDB 中存储关系值的有效方法的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有这个数据模型(我制作了它,所以如果有更好的方法,请告诉我).基本上我有Club,可以有很多Courses.现在我想知道一个俱乐部的所有membersinstructors.membersinstructors 存储在 Course 模型中,并且 Club 有对它们的引用.看代码..

I've this data model (I made it, so if there's a better way to do it, please let me know). Baically I've Club that can have many Courses. now I want to know all the members and instructors of a Club. members and instructors are stored in the Course model, and Club has a reference to them. See the code..

class Course(ndb.Model):
    ...
    instructor_keys = ndb.KeyProperty(kind="User", repeated=True)
    member_keys = ndb.KeyProperty(kind="User", repeated=True)

    @property
    def instructors(self):
        return ndb.get_multi(self.instructor_keys)

    @property
    def members(self):
        return filter(lambda x: x.is_active, ndb.get_multi(self.member_keys))

    def add_instructor(self, instructor):
        if instructor.key not in self.instructor_keys:
            self.instructor_keys.append(instructor.key)
            self.put()

    def rm_instructor(self, instructor):
        if instructor.key in self.instructor_keys:
            self.instructor_keys.remove(instructor.key)
            self.put()

    def add_member(self, member):
        if member.key not in self.member_keys:
            self.member_keys.append(member.key)
            self.put()

    def rm_member(self, member):
        if member.key in self.member_keys:
            self.member_keys.remove(member.key)
            self.put()

class Club(ndb.Model):
    ...
    owners_keys = ndb.KeyProperty(kind="User", repeated=True)
    course_keys = ndb.KeyProperty(kind="Course", repeated=True)


    @property
    def members(self):
        # TODO: is this correct? efficient?
        l_members = []
        for courses in self.courses:
            l_members = l_members + courses.members
        return l_members

    @property
    def trainers(self):
        l_trainers = []
        for courses in self.courses:
            l_trainers = l_trainers + courses.trainers
        return l_trainers

    @property
    def owners(self):
        return ndb.get_multi(self.owners_keys)

    @property
    def courses(self):
        return filter(lambda x: x.is_active, ndb.get_multi(self.course_keys))

    def add_owner(self, owner):
        if owner.key not in self.owners_keys:
            self.owner_keys.append(owner.key)
            self.put()

    def rm_owner(self, owner):
        if owner.key in self.owners_keys:
            self.owner_keys.remove(owner.key)
            self.put()

    def add_course(self, course):
        if course.key not in self.courses_keys:
            self.course_keys.append(course.key)
            self.put()

    def rm_course(self, course):
        if course.key in self.courses_keys:
            self.course_keys.remove(course.key)
            self.put()

    def membership_type(self, user):
        if user.key in self.owners_keys:
            return "OWNER"
        elif user in self.members:
            return "MEMBER"
        elif user in self.trainers:
            return "TRAINER"
        else:
            raise Exception("The user %s is not in the club %s" % (user.id, self.id))

现在,Course 上的 @property 对我来说似乎没问题.(我对吗?)但是 Club 中的那个似乎非常低效.每次我必须迭代所有 Courses 以计算 memberstrainers.此外,这些方法不会被缓存,而是每次都会计算.所以如果它非常昂贵.

Now, the @property on the Course seems to be ok to me. (am I right?) but the one in the Club seems to be very inefficient. every time i've to iterate all the Courses to compute the members and trainers. Plus these methods are not cached but computed every time. So if it's very costly.

有什么建议吗?我正在考虑将 instructorsmembers 作为密钥列表也在 Club 中,并且每次我将某人添加到 Club 时更新俱乐部code>Course,但不确定它是否正确.

Any suggestion? I was thinking about having instructors and members as a list of key also in Club, and update the club every time I add someone to the Course, but not sure it's correct.

PS:有没有更好的方法在 ndb.get_multi 上也做 filter?

PS: Is there a better way to do also the filter on a ndb.get_multi?

推荐答案

我会尝试规范化你的模型,而不是去规范化模型:

I'd try to normalize your model instead of going for a de-normalized one:

class CourseInscription(ndb.Model):
    member = ndb.KeyProperty(kind='User', required=True)
    course = ndb.KeyProperty(kind='Course', required=True)
    is_active = ndb.BooleanProperty(default=True)

然后,您可以添加类似的内容

Then, you can just add something like

class Course(ndb.Model):
    # all the stuff already there

    @property
    def members(self):
        return CourseInscription.query(CourseInscription.course == self.key)

一般来说,我更喜欢只返回查询并让调用者决定直接调用它或添加更多过滤/排序而不是直接执行 ndb.get_multi.

In general, I prefer to just return the query and let the caller decide to even call it directly or add some more filtering/sorting instead of doing ndb.get_multi directly.

我通常做的另一个不错的事情是使用它们的父级为关系实体构造 id,这样我就可以轻松地使用 get by id 来检查是否存在,而不必查询

Another nice touch I usually do is to construct the id for the relational entities using their parents, so I can easily check for existence with a get by id instead of having to query

class CourseInscription(ndb.Model):
    # all the other stuff

    @staticmethod
    def build_id(user_key, course_key):
        return '%s/%s' % (user_key.urlsafe(), course_key.urlsafe())

# somewhere I can create an inscription like

CourseInscription(
    id=CourseInscription.build_id(user_key, course_key),
    user=user_key, course=course_key, is_active=True
).put()

# somewhere else I can check if a User is in a Course by just getting... no queries needed
if ndb.Key(CourseInscription, CourseInscription.build_id(user, course)).get():
    # Then the user is in the course!
else:
    # then it's not

这篇关于在 NDB 中存储关系值的有效方法的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆