以下如何减少? [英] How does the following reduce?
问题描述
我有以下过程来添加三个数字:
I have the following procedure to add three numbers:
(define add-3 (lambda (x y z) (+ x y z)))
(add-3 100 200 300)
; 600
当将其转换为柯里化函数时,它会简化为如下所示,
When converting it to a curried function, it reduces to something like the following,
(apply (lambda args1
(apply add-3 (cons 100 args1)))
'(200 300))
; 600
我的问题是上述情况如何进一步减少?例如,如果我在列表中替换 args1
=(200 300)
我得到以下内容:
My question is how does the above further reduce? For example, if I substitute in the list args1
=(200 300)
I get the following:
(apply (lambda args1
(apply add-3 (cons 100 args1)))
'(200 300))
(apply
(apply add-3 (cons 100 '(200 300))))
但这给了我 ar arity mismatch
,所以我一定在减少/替换中做错了什么.这样做的正确方法是什么?
But that gives me ar arity mismatch
, so I must be doing something wrong in the reduction/substitution. What would be the proper way to do that?
我想一个更直接的提问方式是下面的简化是如何发生的?
I suppose a more direct way to ask this is how does the following simplification occur?
(apply (lambda args (apply add-3 args)) '(100 200 300))
; 600
; ... how do we get here?
(apply add-3 '(100 200 300))
; 600
上下文:https://stackoverflow.com/a/68038585/651174.
推荐答案
以此为基准重新开始:
(define add-3 (lambda (x y z) (+ x y z)))
(add-3 100 200 300)
; 600
然后我们从我们想要减少的函数开始:
And then we start with the function we want to reduce:
(apply (lambda args1
(apply add-3 (cons 100 args1)))
'(200 300))
我们如何减少这种情况?apply 的工作原理如下:
How do we reduce this? The apply works as follows:
(apply + '(1 2))
( + 1 2 )
3
也就是说,它需要一个过程并将其应用于提供的列表中的参数.因此,首先,我们可以采用内部 lambda 函数"并应用它:
That is, it takes a procedure and applies that to the arguments from the list supplied. So, to start off, we can take the 'inner lambda function' and apply that:
((lambda args1 (apply add-3 (cons 100 args1))) 200 300)
这不是什么简化,但我们可以设置 args1='(200 300)
来去掉那个组件,这给了我们:
This isn't much of a simplification, but we can set args1='(200 300)
to get rid of that component, which gives us:
(let ((args1 '(200 300)))
(apply add-3 (cons 100 args1)))
我们可以在这里走几条路线,但为了简化事情,让我们做 (cons 100 args1)
调用,它简化为 (100 200 300)
:
We can go a few routes here, but to simplify things, let's do the (cons 100 args1)
call, which simplifies to (100 200 300)
:
(let ((args1 '(200 300)))
(apply add-3 '(100 200 300)))
注意我们不再有 args1
在正文中,所以我们可以删除 let
:
Notice we no longer have args1
in the body, so we can remove the let
:
(apply add-3 '(100 200 300))
现在我们可以使用(apply func args)
的应用定义->(func arg1 arg2 ...)
得到:
And now we can use the apply definition of (apply func args)
-> (func arg1 arg2 ...)
to get:
(add-3 100 200 300)
这就是我们想要的.请注意,在我们的缩减中,我们能够利用以下优势:
Which is what we wanted. Notice that in our reduction we were able to take advantage of the following:
(apply (lambda args BODY) LIST)
并将其转换为:
(let ((args LIST))
BODY)
这里最简单的例子是:
(apply (lambda args (length args)) '(1 2 3 4))
; {
; BODY = (length args)
; LIST = '(1 2 3 4)
; }
; ==>
(let ((args '(1 2 3 4)))
(length args))
有关更多信息,此答案提供了额外的上下文:https://stackoverflow.com/a/68048663/651174.
For more information, this answer provides additional context: https://stackoverflow.com/a/68048663/651174.
这篇关于以下如何减少?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!