苹果商店接受，提交使用其他服务以获取利润的应用程序 [英] Apple store acceptance, submitting an app which users other services for profit

问题描述

苹果说，

11.2 使用应用内购买 API (IAP) 以外的系统购买应用中的内容、功能或服务的应用将被拒绝.

例如，我的 IOS 应用程序将用于与网络服务进行咨询，并将由我的客户免费提供给用户，因为网络服务是我们的且灵活，它可以提供不同类型的咨询(例如急救指南、电视故障排除、互联网连接故障排除等)，这些都可以由用户在网络服务中更新.但这并不意味着用户可以使用该应用程序购买一些新指南.它将免费提供给用户，具体描述为此应用程序包含这 10 个指南"，但我们向客户收取使用网络服务的许可费，而 iPhone 是我们为客户提供的访问该应用程序的众多方式之一Web 服务并获得这些知识.

For example my IOS app will be used to make consultations with a web service and will be given free to users by my customer, since the web service is ours and flexible, it can offer different and hunderds of types of consultations (e.g first-aid guide, TV troubleshooting, Internet Connection trouble shooting..etc) and this can all be updated in web service by user. But this does not mean that users can use the app to buy some new guides. It will be offered to the users for free with a specific description of "This app includes this 10 guides" but we are charging the customer for license of using out web service and iPhone is one of the many ways we are offering client to access the web service and get that knowledge.

这可能吗?苹果的限制是什么?我可以将此应用程序出售给提供 10 种不同故障排除指南的 CompanyX 吗?然后再卖一个支持 50 个不同指南的 CompnayQ 版本?

Is this possible? and what are the Apple restrictions? Can I sell this app to CompanyX which offers 10 different troubleshooting guides? Then sell CompnayQ another build with supports 50 different guides?

推荐答案

Apple 在他们的 App Store 条款中明确指出，除非应用程序使用他们的采购 API.这就是为什么 e.G.亚马逊不得不从他们的 iOS 版 Kindle 应用程序中删除买书功能.你甚至不能在你的应用程序中有一个网站的链接，该链接会将用户带到你的网站以在 Safari 中购买.AFAIK 即使在您的应用内的某个屏幕上显示文本提示，告诉人们去您的网站购买进一步的服务也可能在审核过程中出现问题.

Apple have made it clear in their terms for the App Store that you must not offer anything for sale - neither products nor services - from inside an app unless it uses their purchasing APIs. This is why e. g. Amazon had to remove the buy-a-book feature from their Kindle app for iOS. You must not even have a link to a website in your app that would take the user to your website for purchase in Safari. AFAIK even a text hint on some screen inside your app telling people to go to your website for purchase of further services might be problematic in the review process.

在我看来(这只是一种意见)，您可能适合 CustomerX 和 CustomerY 的不同应用程序，每个应用程序都提供对您的特定网络服务子集的免费访问.如果任何应用程序的现有用户可以在您的网站上购买附加服务的访问权限，然后在他们各自的应用程序中使用它们，那么您甚至会很好，只要您不从您的应用程序链接到该页面.当然，您仍然需要实施某种用户 ID 系统来识别哪些用户可以访问附加服务，哪些不能.

In my opinion (which is just that, an opinion) you will probably be good with different apps for CustomerX and CustomerY, each offering free access to a specific subset of your web services. You will even be good if existing users of any of the apps can buy access to additional services on your website and then use them in their respective apps, as long as you do not link to that page from your app. You will, of course, still have to implement some kind of user-id system to recognize which users have access to the additional services, and which don't.

我建议你看看亚马逊是怎么做的，因为他们的 Kindle 应用程序肯定受到了评论者的大量审查.跟随他们的脚步，你应该会很好.

I suggest you take a look at how Amazon does it, because their Kindle app has certainly had a lot of scrutiny from the reviewers. Follow their lead and you should be good.

这篇关于苹果商店接受，提交使用其他服务以获取利润的应用程序的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！