Google 地球 - 富客户端还是富 Internet 架构? [英] Google Earth - Rich Client or Rich Internet Architecture?

问题描述

Google 地球是胖客户端(富客户端)应用还是富互联网应用?如果您阅读 Microsoft 架构指南 2.0，他们似乎认为 GE 是胖客户端，以及任何未在网络浏览器或移动设备上呈现的应用程序?

Is Google Earth a Thick Client (Rich Client) application or a Rich Internet Application? If you read the Microsoft Architecture Guide 2.0, they seem to thing GE is a Thick Client, along with any application which is not rendered in a web browser, or on a mobile device?

我认为 GE 是 RIA 的完美例子，还有 微软的虚拟地球 (VE)(现在是 Bing 地图).GE 不在浏览器中呈现的事实不应成为不使其成为 RIA 的定义特征.否则，胖客户端架构就不得不清理太多.

I think GE is a perfect example of a RIA, together with Microsoft's Virtual Earth (VE) (Now Bing Maps). The fact that GE is not rendered in a browser shouldn't be the defining characteristic for not making it an RIA. Otherwise the Thick Client Architecture just has to sweep up too much.

给我你的意见并告诉我你为什么这么说.

Give me your opinions and tell me why you say so.

另见:应该Rich Client Arch 用于多层企业系统

推荐答案

我想这个问题还没有真正的答案.我所做的所有研究都表明，业界尚未完全确定什么是 RIA.

I guess there is no real answer to this yet. All the research I have done points to the fact the industry has not fully made up its minds as to what an RIA is.

Microsoft 认为客户端必须基于浏览器，而 Java 社区仍然感到困惑 ;-) JavaPosse 在这一集中对这个主题进行了很好的处理."来自 jamesh

Microsoft believes the client side must be browser based, while the java community is still confused ;-) "The JavaPosse had a very good treatment on this subject in this episode." from jamesh

实际上，我认为解决问题的最佳方法是不仅严格专注于一种架构来解决特定问题:

Effectively, I think the best solution to the problem would be to not only focus strictly on one architecture to solve a particular problem:

Google 地球实际上是具有富客户端"的RIA"实现. <- 如果这有任何意义.

Google Earth is effectively an "RIA" implementation with a "Rich Client". <- If that makes any sense.

如果有人不同意或有其他意见，请告诉我，否则这将是我将坚持的想法(主要是因为它在我心中使最"有意义，因为现在... ;-)

If anyone disagrees or has other opinions, please let me know, otherwise this would be the thinking I am going to stick with (mostly because it makes the "most" sense in my mind, for now... ;-)

更新:看看下面的图片，忽略我们对移动架构和其他东西的定义，只关注 RIA，这张图是否受到了 Marc Domenig 更有意义(或者至少放置一个 RIA 更好)?

Update: Looking at the image below, and ignoring our definition of things like the Mobile architecture and the rest, and focusing only on RIA, does this diagram inspired by an article by Marc Domenig make more sense (or at least place an RIA better)?

这篇关于Google 地球 - 富客户端还是富 Internet 架构?的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！